From: Prenesh Padayachee (preneshp@xxxxxxxx)
Date: Mon Mar 11 2002 - 05:56:16 GMT-3
Not sure exactly what you are trying to do here. But have you tried creating
a loopback on R1 using the 204.100.100.1 address range and then use extended
pings to use that as a source interface. However you will not get the reply
packets as R3 will see the destination as a locally connected interface. You
could however "debug ip icmp" on R3 and verify that the reply packets are
being sent to the loopback on R1.
-----Original Message-----
From: Shadi [mailto:ccie@investorsgrp.com]
Sent: 11 March 2002 09:42 AM
To: Paul Borghese
Cc: ccielab
Subject: Re: For smart CCIE Candidates
Hi Paul,
How can I change the source address for any packet going out from an
interface, there is no command in the route map to do that!!
----- Original Message -----
From: "Shadi" <ccie@investorsgrp.com>
To: "Paul Borghese" <pborghese@groupstudy.com>
Cc: "ccielab" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Sunday, March 10, 2002 9:34 AM
Subject: Re: For smart CCIE Candidates
> How is that Paul?
>
> I tried to do it like policy routing but it didn't work, I want to make
the
> router inteliginet enough so it can send a ping with source address
network
> to be the same as the destination address network. May be I did something
> wrong, I will see it again, if you have any ideas why not to shoot them
;-)
>
> Shadi
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Paul Borghese" <pborghese@groupstudy.com>
> To: "Shadi" <ccie@investorsgrp.com>; "ccielab" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Saturday, March 09, 2002 4:36 PM
> Subject: Re: For smart CCIE Candidates
>
>
> > Have you tried IP policy routing?
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Shadi" <ccie@investorsgrp.com>
> > To: "ccielab" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> > Sent: Saturday, March 09, 2002 4:05 AM
> > Subject: For smart CCIE Candidates
> >
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > >
> > > If you have two IP addresses on the same interface (one primary and
the
> > other
> > > secondary), how can you make the router for each network it tries to
> reach
> > it
> > > should use one of the ip addresses as the source ip for that network?
> > >
> > >
> > > R1 wants to ping R2 it should use 10.1.1.1 (which is by default
works)?
> > >
> > > R1 wants to ping R3 is should use 204.100.100.1 as the source IP
address
> > not
> > > 10.1.1.1,
> > >
> > > I tried it with Nating but it didn't work with me!!!
> > >
> > > So anybody have any ideas?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
R1(10.1.1.1)----------------------------------------------------------------
> > R
> > > 2(10.1.1.1)
> > > (204.100.100.1 Secondary)
> > > |
> > > |
> > > |
> > > |
> > > |
> > > R3
> > > (204.100.100.2)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:57:00 GMT-3