From: George Hansen (HansenG@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Tue Mar 12 2002 - 14:51:00 GMT-3
or try Multilink PPP over Frame relay
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios121/121newft/121t/1
21t5/dtlfifra.htm
George
>>> MADMAN <dmadlan@qwest.com> 03/12/02 08:10AM >>>
Have you looked at mulitlink frame realy?
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios120/120newft/120lim
it/120s/120s17/17s_mfr.htm
Dave
Shane Miles wrote:
>
> Myh goal is to load-balance the 10 PVCs. I want to figure out a way
> around the 6 paths limitation.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jason Miller [mailto:jasmille@cisco.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 6:23 AM
> To: Shane Miles; 'ccielab@groupstudy.com'
> Subject: Re: FR load-balancing
>
> Seems like you want to treat the group of PVCs as one connection. Why not
> just define one PVC on the FR switch running the rate you want? You would
> have one layer 2 circuit running the speed you want and don't need to mess
> with load balancing at layer 3.
>
> At 06:21 PM 3/11/2002 -0500, Shane Miles wrote:
> > Scenerio: Two sites connected with 10 Frame Relay PVCs each with a
> >CIR of 1.544 Mbs. OSPF is the routing protocol and at each site the PVCs
> >are all coming in on a single DS3 physical interface. Is it possible to
> >configure the PVCs/OSPF to allow for load-balancing beyond the 6 paths
> >limitation? I've thought of putting all the PVCs on the physical interface
> >but I'm not sure how IOS will utilize the PVCs in that configuration and 10
> >subinterfaces trips me up with the 6 paths limitation. An ideas? Thanks.
> >
> >--
> >Shane
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:57:02 GMT-3