From: Erhan Kurt (iekurt@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Mon Mar 18 2002 - 09:36:07 GMT-3
Hi Tim,
As far as I know, Emmanuelle's answer is correct:
source-bridge explorerq-depth 100.
I remembered the same question and the same answer
from else where.
Cheers,
Erhan
--- Tim O'Brien <tobrien@cinci.rr.com> wrote:
> Are we sure that this question is best answered with
> a source-bridge
> command? I could also read it that we would need to
> change the hold queue on
> the TokenRing interface from the default of 75
> frames to 100. The question
> reads, 100 frames, not 100 explorer frames. And even
> if we raised the value
> of the explorerQ, we could still drop explorer
> frames with other traffic
> getting there first and filling the queue. This is
> the kind of detail that
> has nailed me on the last couple of lab attempts,
> now I am paranoid... : )
> Thoughts?
>
> Tim
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Emmanuel Oppong" <e-oppong@attbi.com>
> To: "Manny Gonzalez" <gonzalu@nyp.org>; "CCIELab at
> GroupStudy.com"
> <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Sunday, March 17, 2002 8:52 PM
> Subject: RE: --- DLSw+ ---
>
>
> Here is your answer:
>
> source-bridge explorerQ-depth 100
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com
> [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
> Manny Gonzalez
> Sent: Sunday, March 17, 2002 12:06 PM
> To: CCIELab at GroupStudy.com
> Subject: --- DLSw+ ---
>
>
> I am doing a lab a friend got from a class he
> attended in NY. There is a
> question in the DLSw section that has puzzled the
> heck out of me and I
> simply can not make sense of it. Perhaps someone
> here can help:
>
> "7.3 Assuming Ring 2 is sending a lot of explorer
> frames, which causes
> R2 token ring to drop frames, configure R2 so that
> the token ring will
> accept at least 100 frames."
>
> Now, I know I can stop the explorers by populating
> the reachability
> tables with ICANREACH, but, what the heck is this
> "accept at least 100
> frames" stuff?
>
> TIA
>
> Manny
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:57:12 GMT-3