From: Manny Gonzalez (gonzalu@xxxxxxx)
Date: Thu Mar 21 2002 - 12:22:17 GMT-3
Also be careful with your selection of clock rate. Some routers (can't
place exactly the right combination right now) do not like certain
clockrates and will not work. Interface will remain down.
When in doubt, use a clock of 64000. This seems to work for any router I
have set up so far.
MADMAN wrote:
>
> Here is all you need:
>
> interface Serial7/0/0.16 point-to-point
> ip address 70.1.1.2 255.255.255.0
> frame-relay interface-dlci 16
>
> interface Serial4/1/1.17 point-to-point
> ip address 71.1.1.1 255.255.255.0
> no ip directed-broadcast
> clock rate 2000000
> no cdp enable
> frame-relay interface-dlci 16
>
> Some platforms require you to disable keepalive.
>
> Dave
>
> Ludwig Morales wrote:
> >
> > Yes, just remember that 1 of the equipment should provide clock rate xxxx
> > (for physical DCE interface) as well as the Frame Relay Interface DCE (don'
t
> > really remember the exact syntax, but that's the overall idea) for layer
> > DCE, also remember to put the same DLCI on both equipment and enable a LMI.
> > Hoper this helps
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Ludwig
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Mannan Venkatesan" <mv_lab@hotmail.com>
> > To: "Shadi" <ccie@investorsgrp.com>; "ccielab" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> > Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 12:29 AM
> > Subject: Re: Frame-relay back to back
> >
> > > Yes. Use PtP sub-int with same DLCI number on both routers. I have seen a
> > > sample config on CCO somewhere. Can search for you if you want.
> > >
> > > Mannan
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Shadi" <ccie@investorsgrp.com>
> > > To: "ccielab" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> > > Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 10:26 AM
> > > Subject: Frame-relay back to back
> > >
> > >
> > > > Hi all,
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Is there a way to connect two router back to back without the need of
> > > > frame-relay switch?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > if there, please provide me with the minimal configuration on how to
> > make
> > > it
> > > > work?
> > > >
> > > > Shadi
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:57:16 GMT-3