Re: Re: ATM Command - New vs Old

From: kinwei@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Tue Apr 09 2002 - 11:43:30 GMT-3


   
Hi Richard, i think the problem should be due to the IOS bug on both atm router
. Both my routers are running 12.1(13)GD code, according to release note, it ha
s a lot of bugs relate to ATM. Will try a different IOS tomorrow, maybe a T cod
e.

regards,
lee

>
> From: Richard Furda <riso@furda.net>
> Date: 2002/04/09 Tue PM 01:29:03 CST
> To: kinwei@idigi.net.my
> CC: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Re: ATM Command - New vs Old
>
>
> Hi,
>
>
> On Tue, 9 Apr 2002 kinwei@idigi.net.my wrote:
> > Hi all, in the following URL stated that atm old command only valid until 1
1.3(T).
> >
> > http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/121/routed_LLC.html
> >
> > After 11.3(T), the "atm pvc x x x" command will not valid anymore. Is that
true ?
>
> not true. My 2 boxes; c4500 running 12.1(11) and c7200 12.X (i turned the
> box off) were able to create PVS the "old way"
>
> > i faced problem to configure atm pvc using the old command on 12.1(13)
> > atm router. Will new command, it just works fine.
>
> Here is my config:
>
>
> [7200--(atm1/0)]=====[(atm4/0/0)-LS1010-(atm4/0/1)]=====[(atm0)--4500]
>
>
>
> R1 c7200 config:
>
> interface ATM1/0
> ip address 10.10.10.72 255.255.255.128
> no ip directed-broadcast
> atm sonet stm-1
> atm pvc 1 1 7200 aal5snap
> atm enable-ilmi-trap
> atm ilmi-keepalive
> map-group 7200pvc
> !
> map-list 7200pvc
> ip 10.10.10.45 atm-vc 1 broadcast
> !
>
>
>
>
> R2 c4500 config:
>
> interface ATM0
> ip address 10.10.10.45 255.255.255.128
> map-group pvc1000
> atm pvc 1 1 1000 aal5snap
> atm ilmi-keepalive
> !
> map-list pvc1000
> ip 10.10.10.72 atm-vc 1 broadcast
> !
>
>
>
> LS1010 ATM switch:
>
> interface ATM4/0/1
> no keepalive
> atm pvc 1 1000 interface ATM4/0/0 1 7200
> !



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:58:01 GMT-3