From: Geoffrey KIM (Geoffrey.KIM@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sat Apr 13 2002 - 04:35:47 GMT-3
Engelhard,
Any supporting doco on that? I can make the LLC2 work on all
combinations of FR interface types, but I am not able to make the DLSw
direct encap with 'pass-thru' work... on any combination of FR
interfaces including phy-phy.
Does anyone have a more definitive answer for this?
Thanks,
Geoffrey
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On
> Behalf Of Engelhard M. Labiro
> Sent: Saturday, April 13, 2002 4:14 PM
> To: Jeongwoo Park; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Re: DSLW direct encap --Peer disconnected--Drives me crazy.
>
>
> Hi Park,
>
> Your scenario as follow: Frame Relay point-to-point between
> HQ and Branch router.
>
> With this scenario, DLSw direct encap using "frame-relay
> map llc2" command can not be configured under point-to-point
> interface configuration mode.
> Last time when I tried this scenario, the peer will automatically
> detects its remote-peer and connect as LLC (DLSw+ Lite)
> peer.
>
> One thing that we have to remember, DLSw direct encap
> "frame-relay map dlsw" ( pass-thru ) will never
> work under point-to-point or multipoint interface .
> "frame-relay map dlsw" will only work on physical Frame-Relay
> interface.
>
>
> Engelhard M. Labiro (engelhard@netmarks.co.jp)
> Security Group, Technical Solution Center, Netmarks Inc.
> 2-13-34 Konan, Minato-Ku, Tokyo 108-0075
> Tel: +81-3-5461-2575, Fax: +81-3-5461-2093
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jeongwoo Park" <jpark@wams.com>
> To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Saturday, April 13, 2002 3:02 PM
> Subject: DSLW direct encap --Peer disconnected--Drives me crazy.
>
>
> > Ok DLSW gurus.
> > DLSW over frame relay is not working.
> > I saw your discussions on posts.
> > I couldn't decide which way was correct way because too many
> > conflict opinions against each other and cisco doc were there
> > So, I tested it out myself. I couldn't get it to work. I
> tried different
> > kinds of combination, such as with pass-thru, w/o pass-thru, with
> > frame-map dlsw and with frame-relay llce. No luck, so I am asking
> > your help.
> >
> > I had TCP encap over FR working, but no luck on direct encap nor
> > on dlsw lite.
> > ether-router---------------------------------router-ether
> > frame-relay
> > Take a look at my config.
> >
> > What am I missing.
> >
> >
> > hostname HQ
> > !
> > logging buffered 99999 debugging
> > enable secret 5 $1$y2he$lnUO
> > enable password xxxx
> > !
> > clock timezone PST -8
> > ip subnet-zero
> > no ip domain-lookup
> > !
> > !dlsw local-peer peer-id 1.1.1.1
> > dlsw remote-peer 0 frame-relay interface Serial0/0 110
> > dlsw bridge-group 1
> > !
> > interface Loopback0
> > ip address 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.255
> > !
> > interface FastEthernet0/0
> > ip address 192.22.22.254 255.255.255.0
> > speed 100
> > full-duplex
> > bridge-group 1
> > !
> > interface Serial0/0
> > no ip address
> > encapsulation frame-relay
> > no fair-queue
> > service-module t1 timeslots 1-8
> > !
> > interface Serial0/0.110 point-to-point
> > description Connection to Salinas_New
> > ip address 10.0.5.1 255.255.255.252
> > no arp frame-relay
> > frame-relay interface-dlci 110
> > !
> > !
> > bridge 1 protocol ieee
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------
> >
> > hostname Branch
> > !
> > logging buffered 4096 debugging
> > enable password 7 06110
> > !
> > memory-size iomem 25
> > ip subnet-zero
> > no ip finger
> > no ip domain-lookup
> > !
> > dlsw local-peer peer-id 10.0.5.2
> > dlsw remote-peer 0 frame-relay interface Serial0/0 100
> > !
> > !
> > !
> > interface FastEthernet0/0
> > ip address 10.100.5.2 255.255.255.0
> > duplex auto
> > speed auto
> > bridge-group 1
> > !
> > interface Serial0/0
> > ip address 10.0.5.2 255.255.255.252
> > encapsulation frame-relay
> > no fair-queue
> > service-module t1 timeslots 1-8
> > frame-relay interface-dlci 100
> > !
> > !
> > ip classless
> > ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 10.0.5.1
> > no ip http server
> > !
> > bridge 1 protocol ieee
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:58:07 GMT-3