From: Shadi (ccie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu Apr 25 2002 - 06:22:39 GMT-3
I agree, but you can redisctribute the connected interface inside the OSPF
process and then use the summary-address on R1. But double check that the sh
ip ospf database external has the redistirubute connected routes.
----- Original Message -----
From: "yakout esmat" <yesmat@iprimus.com.au>
To: "Michael Kilpatrick" <mjkilpat@yahoo.com>; "Bob Sinclair"
<bsin@erols.com>; "Alex Paulino" <Alex@2s.com.br>
Cc: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2002 7:57 AM
Subject: RE: ospf and igrp
> One way of doing this:
>
> In R1 which is an ASBR (where you are redistributing), you can't use 'area
> range...', you can creat another ospf process and redistribute your
original
> ospf process into the new one, then use 'summary-address...' command under
> the new process to summarise your /27 & /29 into /24. Then redistribute
the
> new ospf process (or both of them)into IGRP.
>
> Of course you need to make sure you are running IOS 12.1, otherwise you
will
> need to enter static routes to NULL0 when you do your 'summary-address...'
> command.
>
> Let me know
>
> HTH
>
> Ya
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
> Michael Kilpatrick
> Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2002 2:57 PM
> To: Bob Sinclair; Alex Paulino
> Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Re: ospf and igrp
>
>
> Bob,
> It seems to me that this will get the 20 network over to router 0 but not
> the 200 network.... because the range command only summarizes at the ABR
> boundary. And in this case we are summarizing the 200 network into area 0
> (to the right)... R1 is directly connected to net 200 and therefore I
think
> we have to do something there.
>
> Mike
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Bob Sinclair" <bsin@erols.com>
> To: "Alex Paulino" <Alex@2s.com.br>
> Cc: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 11:59 PM
> Subject: Re: ospf and igrp
>
>
> > Alex,
> >
> > Try the following on R2:
> >
> > area 1 range 140.10.200.0 255.255.255.0
> > area 0 range140.1.20.0 255.255.255.0
> >
> > On R1, redistribute ospf into igrp. This works for me with a very
> similar setup. Should see 140.10.200.0/24 and 140.1.20.0/24 on R1 and R0.
> >
> > -Bob
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Alex Paulino" <Alex@2s.com.br>
> > To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> > Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 10:47 PM
> > Subject: ospf and igrp
> >
> >
> > > Hi all, i know that this subject already was commented, but i'm still
in
> > > doubt.
> > >
> > > R0)-----140.1.56.0/24 -----R1 -----140.1.200.0/29 -----------R2
> > > -------140.1.20.0/27-----------R3
> > >
> > > Between: R0 and R1 - IGRP
> > > between: R1 and R2 - OSPF AREA 1
> > > between:R2 and R3 - OSPF AREA 0
> > >
> > > 1) My problem is the /27 (area0) and /29 (area1) doesn't appear in R0
> (igrp).
> > > I have tried to put a "area 1 range 140.1.200.0 255.255.255.0" in R2
or
> R1,
> > > and, this route never up in R0. I don't know if is correctly.
> > >
> > > 2) I don't know what to do in /29 case. :-(
> > >
> > > thanks for help
> > >
> > >
> > > Alex
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:58:19 GMT-3