From: David Luu (wicked01@xxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Fri Apr 26 2002 - 15:25:28 GMT-3
create secondary addresses on igrp with the /29 mask and tunnel it to
ospf's /29...
btw, i use statics and sometimes defaults for my tunnels (following cisco's
examples on tunnels)...does anyone know if this is acceptable on the lab?
since technically it does violate the no static rule...is there anyone that
has an example of a tunnel without using them?
At 10:26 AM 4/26/2002 -0700, Jaspreet Bhatia wrote:
>Gentlemen,
> I kinda know how to redistribute between OSPF
> and IGRP when IGRP has a smaller mask say /24 than OSPF say /29 . The way
> to do this is to make a loopback interface with the same major net as
> OSPF with a /24 mask and redistribute connected into IGRP using the
> connected statement and a route-map for carefully controlling route
> redistribution into IGRP . This works like a charm .....
>
>
>Now here is my problem ........
>
>
> How do I redistribute OSPF into IGRP when IGRP mask is /30 and OSPF
> mask is /29 that is IGRP has a longer mask than OSPF . There is a way
> suggested on CCO ( although it is against the most basic lab rule -- NO
> STATIC ROUTES ) . The CCO doc says that I can make a static route with
> mask of /30 ( ingress interface of IGRP ) and point it to either the
> next hop on the OSPF network or an interface leading to that subnet on
> the OSPF network . I tried this and this is leading to routes with
> inaccessible metric going into the IGRP domain . NOT GOOD . Anyone can
> help me out of this problem ..... . Also I have secondary interfaces
> with Split horizon turned off on teh IGRP side .....
>
>
>Help Help Please .....
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:58:20 GMT-3