From: Jeff Szeto (jytszeto@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu May 09 2002 - 07:15:19 GMT-3
Hi Group,
I am sorry that I have made a mistake.
The IGRP routes that shown in the RIP router are directly connected to the
redistributing router. Use Askan 's topology, it is connecting to X
directly. So, these networks are also in the RIP process as they are in the
same major class.
So, I think Askan is right.
Just to discover this after spending hours. Must study harder.
Jeff
----- Original Message -----
From: Umit A?kan (TK-Network Cozumleri) <umit.askan@probil.com.tr>
To: 'Jeff Szeto' <jytszeto@hotmail.com>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2002 10:03 PM
Subject: RE: Redistribute ospf external route into igrp
> Hi,
> See below ;
> A-subnets
> RIP
> !
> B-subnets IGRP--------X--------OSPF C-subnets
>
> X redistributes mutually OSPF-RIP and OSPF-IGRP.
> at A router you can see only A,C
> at B router you can see only B,C
> at C router you can see only A,B,C
>
> so it is normal you can't see RIP routes from IGRP place. The thing that
> isn't normal is you can see the IGRP routes at RIP place. please send
> the configs.
>
> Best Regards
> umit
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jeff Szeto [mailto:jytszeto@hotmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2002 11:20
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Redistribute ospf external route into igrp
>
>
> Hi,
>
> A router runs IGRP, OSPF and RIP. Mutual redistribution exist between
> OSPF---RIP and OSPF---IGRP. But no redistribution between IGRP and RIP.
> From the debug message I found that IGRP is no advertising the RIP
> routes
> that are redistributed into OSPF while the OSPF routes are advertised
> normally.
> On the other hand, the IGRP routes are advertised into RIP through OSPF.
>
> Could someone explain the concept behind or point me to a document.
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> Jeff
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:58:53 GMT-3