From: thomas larus (tlarus@xxxxxxx)
Date: Sat May 11 2002 - 13:41:48 GMT-3
And I strongly suspect that the powers-that-be would not permit a licensed lawy
er use the .pro for his, say, computer networking consulting business or busine
ss selling CCNA or CCNP practice lab scenarios.
It really is ridiculous. Most network engineers do a lot more good and a lot l
ess harm than many lawyers do.
I, for one, like the idea of going home knowing that one did some good that day
. A person who cleans homes or businesses for a living is someone who can defi
nitely know that he did some good that day. But computer networking is fascina
ting.
>>> "Christopher Jarosz" <cajarosz@attbi.com> 05/11/02 03:32 AM >>>
I personally like the .god domain.......
chrisj
----- Original Message -----
From: "Antonio Marfil" <tony.marfil@networxcorp.com>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 9:55 PM
Subject: OT: Will CCIEs qualify for a .pro domain name?
> This should be of interest:
> http://www.msnbc.com/news/750722.asp
>
> Is anyone lobbying for CCIEs to qualify for a .pro address? To the other
> CCIEs either with numbers or soon to be, would you guys be interested in
> qualifying for a .pro domain? Under the current standard it doesn't look
> like we qualify. This is ironic considering that we network engineers are
> the ones that keep the IT infrastructure that makes this all possible
> running smoothly. Any thoughts or comments?
> --
>
> Regards,
>
> Antonio Marfil, CCIE #9011
> Senior Network Engineer
> NetworX Corporation
> tony.marfil@networxcorp.com
> http://www.networxcorp.com
> --
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:58:54 GMT-3