From: Logan, Harold (loganh@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Mon May 20 2002 - 12:07:43 GMT-3
I don't know if this is permissible in the lab or not, but the last resort for
making VLSM routes accessible to IGRP is the ip default-network command.
On the router running IGRP, what's the mask on the interface? If summarizing to
a classful boundary doesn't work, you may want to try summarizing to the mask
on the interface of the IGRP router.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rthugo1@aol.com [mailto:Rthugo1@aol.com]
> Sent: Monday, May 20, 2002 10:25 AM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Doyle p.380 "ip summary-add" with EIGRP??
>
>
> Hey All,
>
> I know this may have come up before, but I could'nt find
> anything in the
> archives and I checked the ciscopress website to see if this
> was errata. NO
> LUCK! Anyway, on p.380, he says by using the "ip
> summary-sddress eigrp" you
> can access the serial interfaces on the EIGRP routers with
> /30 subnets from
> the IGRP router by applying a /30 subnet using the "ip summ"
> command. I
> tried it and it doesn't work......I tried both the /24 and
> /30 subnet in the
> command and no luck. From my understanding, it says on the
> Cisco website
> that VLSM's CANNOT be redistributed into IGRP / RIP V1. I
> really need
> clarification on this, folks!
> THANKS!
>
> Rob H. NP, DP, blah,blah,blah....................
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:59:02 GMT-3