Re: [Urgent] What's this simple BGP qn asking for?

From: Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sun May 26 2002 - 09:53:25 GMT-3

• Next message: Carlos G Mendioroz: "Re: dlsw and tcp port 2067"
• Previous message: michael.a.miller@xxxxxxx: "Re: FW: CCIE Wanted. [3:4764]"
• Maybe in reply to: eric ong: "[Urgent] What's this simple BGP qn asking for?"
• Next in thread: eric ong: "Re: [Urgent] What's this simple BGP qn asking for?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

   
My guess is to assign the IP address (range) to an interface (loopback?)
and advertise it using "network x.x.x.x" via BGP. So you can ping it from
BGP routers.. It doesn't say anything about advertising it via IGP..

         oli

At 19:30 26.05.2002 +0800, eric ong wrote:
>Qn: On R1, assign and advertise x.x.x.x through BGP.
>
>x.x.x.x is not being advertised by any other protocols.
>
>So what is this question asking for?
>
>Just make x.x.x.x appear in all BGP routers' BGP table, don't care if
>it's pingable?
>
>Or must the whole network (non-BGP routers too) be able to ping
>x.x.x.x?
>
>If it's the latter, can I advertise x.x.x.x through IGP or must I
>redistribute BGP into IGP on R1?
>
>Last 3 days, would greatly appreciate some help. Thanks.
>
>Regards,
>Eric Ong
>

• Next message: Carlos G Mendioroz: "Re: dlsw and tcp port 2067"
• Previous message: michael.a.miller@xxxxxxx: "Re: FW: CCIE Wanted. [3:4764]"
• Maybe in reply to: eric ong: "[Urgent] What's this simple BGP qn asking for?"
• Next in thread: eric ong: "Re: [Urgent] What's this simple BGP qn asking for?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:59:09 GMT-3