From: Paul (p_chopin@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Mon May 27 2002 - 15:58:52 GMT-3
That would be fine.But we are only running rip ver1.
We all know how to summerize networks with address /25
/26 and so on in order to redistriburte them to
classfull protocols. But how we do that for nets /19
/20 when when classfull protocol interface has biger
mask.
paul
--- Emmanuel Oppong <e-oppong@attbi.com> wrote:
> Paul,
>
> For OSPF-RIP why don't you use "ip rip send version
> 2 on OSRF router
> interface, and "ip rip receive version 2" on RIP
> router interface?
> For OSPF-IGRP why don't you use "ip
> default-information originate" or " ip
> default-network ..."?
>
> E
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com
> [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
> Paul
> Sent: Monday, May 27, 2002 1:09 AM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Route redistribution
>
>
> Hi group,
> Please correct me if I'm wrong, but after intensive
> testing it seems to me there is no way to
> redistribute
> ospf route let's say 140.10.0.0/22 into rip or igrp
> domain over /24 interface of the same majore net(
> 140.10.1.0/24).Secondary addressing doesn't work in
> this case. Tunneling might work but is awkward.
> Only default route seems to be solution.(which is
> not
> allowed in the lab of course).
> I'm taking lab soon, and I'd appreciate any ideas
> Thank you .
> Paul
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:59:10 GMT-3