From: Paul (p_chopin@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Mon May 27 2002 - 19:32:38 GMT-3
Thanks Nigel. You right.I'll try it in lab
Paul
--- Nigel Taylor <nigel_taylor@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Paul,
> The RIP routers will know of the network
> through the summary route
> as I stated. The key here is that once
> the packet bound to the destination the ASBR
> performing redistribution will
> route the packet based on the classful
> perfix match. The important note here is that the
> summary route(let's say we
> used x.x.x.x/24, instead of the /19) will
> be learned through the RIP domain just fine.
>
> I don't have the entire picture of what you're
> trying to accomplish but this
> seems like it should work.
>
>
> Nigel
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Paul" <p_chopin@yahoo.com>
> To: "Nigel Taylor" <nigel_taylor@hotmail.com>
> Cc: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Monday, May 27, 2002 4:38 PM
> Subject: Re: Route redistribution
>
>
> > Thanks, this is really interesting suggustion, but
> it
> > won't work in my scenario. How other routers in
> rip
> > domain will know about /19 network ?(except for
> > defalult
> > route)
> > Paul
> > --- Nigel Taylor <nigel_taylor@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > > Paul,
> > > In the past I had a scanerio where this
> was
> > > the problem, I came up
> > > with the use of the "no ip classless" command.
> > > The key here is that in summarizing the /19 to a
> > > longer mask. This with the
> > > "no ip classless" should allow for packets to
> > > be routed through the network, however when
> arriving
> > > on the locally sourced
> > > router, the packet should remain classfull
> > > and be routed to the correct segment versus
> using
> > > the summary route. Of
> > > course there are only few circumstances where
> > > this configuration will make sense, a lab
> enviroment
> > > is major one of them
> > > that comes to mind.
> > >
> > > Here's a pretty good link. I know a couple of
> years
> > > ago there was a pretty
> > > active on the list about using the "ip
> classless"
> > > command. Check there as well if interested.
> > >
> > > http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/105/21.html
> > >
> > > HTH
> > >
> > > Nigel
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Paul" <p_chopin@yahoo.com>
> > > To: "Emmanuel Oppong" <e-oppong@attbi.com>
> > > Cc: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> > > Sent: Monday, May 27, 2002 2:58 PM
> > > Subject: RE: Route redistribution
> > >
> > >
> > > > That would be fine.But we are only running rip
> > > ver1.
> > > > We all know how to summerize networks with
> address
> > > /25
> > > > /26 and so on in order to redistriburte them
> to
> > > > classfull protocols. But how we do that for
> nets
> > > /19
> > > > /20 when when classfull protocol interface has
> > > biger
> > > > mask.
> > > > paul
> > > > --- Emmanuel Oppong <e-oppong@attbi.com>
> wrote:
> > > > > Paul,
> > > > >
> > > > > For OSPF-RIP why don't you use "ip rip send
> > > version
> > > > > 2 on OSRF router
> > > > > interface, and "ip rip receive version 2"
> on
> > > RIP
> > > > > router interface?
> > > > > For OSPF-IGRP why don't you use "ip
> > > > > default-information originate" or " ip
> > > > > default-network ..."?
> > > > >
> > > > > E
> > > > >
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: nobody@groupstudy.com
> > > > > [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
> > > > > Paul
> > > > > Sent: Monday, May 27, 2002 1:09 AM
> > > > > To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > > > > Subject: Route redistribution
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi group,
> > > > > Please correct me if I'm wrong, but after
> > > intensive
> > > > > testing it seems to me there is no way to
> > > > > redistribute
> > > > > ospf route let's say 140.10.0.0/22 into rip
> or
> > > igrp
> > > > > domain over /24 interface of the same majore
> > > net(
> > > > > 140.10.1.0/24).Secondary addressing doesn't
> work
> > > in
> > > > > this case. Tunneling might work but is
> awkward.
> > > > > Only default route seems to be
> solution.(which
> > > is
> > > > > not
> > > > > allowed in the lab of course).
> > > > > I'm taking lab soon, and I'd appreciate any
> > > ideas
> > > > > Thank you .
> > > > > Paul
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:59:10 GMT-3