From: Carlos G Mendioroz (tron@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Fri May 31 2002 - 20:10:18 GMT-3
Or it could be a connected network (local) in which case,
you would need to redistribute connected to make it work.
This seems to be a loop prevention system...
David Ham wrote:
>
> Tony,
>
> It looks like synchronisation problem.
>
> Do the " NO SYN" or try match Router ID on BGP and OSPF.
>
> David Ham
> OPTUS
>
> >From: Tony Russell <trussell@ibeam.com>
> >Reply-To: Tony Russell <trussell@ibeam.com>
> >To: "'ccielab@groupstudy.com'" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> >Subject: BGP into ospf
> >Date: Fri, 31 May 2002 11:39:08 -0500
> >
> >I am trying to redistribute some BGP routes into OSPF.. one of the routes
> >is
> >making it and the other is not.... I am unsure as to why.. can anyone shed
> >any light on this???? I am wondering if there is anything specific that I
> >should know about BGP to OSPF redistribution that I am obviously missing.
> >Here are some specifics
> >
> > 172.168.0.0/24 is subnetted, 2 subnets
> >B 172.168.70.0 [20/170] via 137.20.10.70, 00:10:46
> >B 172.168.80.0 [200/170] via 137.20.86.1, 00:00:49
> >
> >The 172.168.70.0 route is making it to the next router but the 172.168.80.0
> >is not.
> >
> >Here are the bgp entries
> >
> >*> 172.168.70.0/24 137.20.10.70 170 0 3 i
> >*>i172.168.80.0/24 137.20.86.1 170 100 0 1 i
> >
> >The 80 route shows the i for iBGP, but I thought it should still make it
> >into OSPF
> >
> >Here is the redistribute command
> >redistribute bgp 2 metric 1592 subnets
> >
> >Lets say that R1 has the BGP routes and R1 and R2 are running OSPF....
> >after
> >redistributing BGP into OSPF I fully expected both routes to show... but
> >only one does....
> >
> >Tony Russell
> >Media Engineer
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:59:13 GMT-3