From: Tom Young (gitsyoung@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sat Jun 01 2002 - 14:48:33 GMT-3
John,
Thank you for reply me so quick. and you said I could
use a static ip address. I want to ask you may I set a
globe address on my e0 port? I think I should get the
address from ISP by negotiation parameter setting, right?
And then , I want to ask if I connect a router to ADSL
modem by PPPoE, which port should I use, the ether port or
the wan port?
Thanks alot
Young
--- John Underhill <stepnwlf@magma.ca> $B$+$i$N%a%C%;!<%8(B
$B!'(B
> If you are looking to have all your routers avail to
> the net, I would set
> the e0 address as static, define it as the global
> address and use NAT for
> the conversion. ex
> ip nat pool mypool 200.1.1.1 200.1.1.1 netmask
> 255.255.255.0
> ip nat inside source list 1 pool mypool overload
> access-list 1 permit 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Tom Young" <gitsyoung@yahoo.co.jp>
> To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Saturday, June 01, 2002 1:15 PM
> Subject: IP address for PPPoE
>
>
> > HI, everybody
> >
> > I am using a router was configed PPPoE access
> the ISP
> > through ADSL modem, But I don't know the ip
> address in the
> > two ether ports.
> > If I using the e0 to ADSL modem and e1 to LAN.
> >
> > 1, e0 will receive a IP address from ISP, by
> negotiation.
> > For the e1 I could config private address
> free,(for
> > example 192.168.1.254) right?
> >
> > 2, Should I do some routing protocol for the
> routing
> > between e0 and Lan?
> >
> > Thanks alot
> >
> > Young
> >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Jul 02 2002 - 08:12:19 GMT-3