From: Nick Shah (nshah@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Mon Jun 17 2002 - 06:13:44 GMT-3
Agreed, that you cannot ask the Proctor, "which method do you think is the
best ?" but you can always ask, are you asking for A & B or A & C or only A
? Or is it ok to filter LSA 3 as well ?
ps. I havent taken the lab yet.
rgds
----- Original Message -----
From: elping <elpingu@acedsl.com>
To: Anthony Pace <anthonypace@fastmail.fm>
Cc: Wes Stevens <ccie_miami@hotmail.com>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Monday, June 17, 2002 1:56 PM
Subject: Re: Interpretaion of questions
> good luck Wes....on you method on writing it down and showing the
proctor...
>
> I have interpreted one thing and showed the proctor all he said
> "I cant's say yeah or nay"
>
> onother one said
> "configure what it says"
>
> maybe you will be the lucky one and he will tell you
> "configure number your option 3 "
> and do the test for you...
>
> sorry if I sound sarcastic but I have never been able to squeeze any good
> nugets out a proctor.
>
> If you have practiced and read enough you will know what you have to do...
>
> EL ping
>
>
> Anthony Pace wrote:
>
> > I have the same problem interpreting the "lab questions". Many times
> > the best solution is not the correct one and it becomes important to
> > adhere to the "letter of the law" not the "spirit of the law" when
> > interpreting questions. This goes for the practice tests as well. One
> > thing I will do next time is "neatly write several options down" and
> > show them to the proctor. Others have said this is helpfull. I did not
> > avail myself of this when I took the test. Instead I chose to "stew in
> > my own juices' and waste alot of time speculating about all the
> > possible combinations of things which they "might" be looking for.
> >
> > Anthony PAce
> >
> > On Sun, 16 Jun 2002 00:14:11 +0000, "Wes Stevens"
> > <ccie_miami@hotmail.com> said:
> > > My first attempt was friday. I did not pass. Time was not that big of
> > > an
> > > issue. I was done with an hour left to check things. Everything seemed
> > > to
> > > work and I felt that I had at least followed the rules. But they must
> > > have
> > > not of liked my solutions. The interesting thing is that the parts
that
> > > seemed the easist were where I did the worst. The part that kicked my
> > > butt I
> > > did well in. I think part is that I got over confident on the easy
> > > parts and
> > > did not pay enough attention to them. But part is also the ability to
> > > interpret what they want for a solution. I don't feel experience is a
> > > big
> > > help here. I have been doing networking for many years and have never
> > > seen
> > > anything like what they put in front of me in the real world. I did
> > > give
> > > them a solution that worked and was technically sound - but that for
> > > sure
> > > was not enough. I have talked to several people that suggest a boot
> > > camp -
> > > many of them are designed to build up your skills in interpreting the
> > > lab.
> > > But I am on my own on this - no help from my company. I would really
> > > rather
> > > not have to pay for a bootcamp.
> > >
> > > So my question is what do you do - what do study and how do you study
> > > to
> > > build up these skills.
> > >
> > >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Jul 02 2002 - 08:12:34 GMT-3