From: George Spahl (g.spahl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu Jun 20 2002 - 10:21:44 GMT-3
Carlos,
Would you mind elaborating on that port 2067? I recently had a problem
where it seemed that my border peer was hammering it's peer group with
packets sent to source port 0, dest port 2067. It would repeatedly send
a 219 byte packet and the peers would reply to it. I have no idea what
was going on but when I removed the peer group it all stopped. Any
ideas what 2067 is used for?
Thanks,
George
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Carlos G Mendioroz
Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 8:13 AM
To: steven.j.nelson@bt.com
Cc: harish.dv@peakxv.net; Robert.McCallum@let-it-be-thus.com;
anthonypace@fastmail.fm; ccielab@groupstudy.com; elpingu@acedsl.com;
nobody@groupstudy.com; tr@contract.hu
Subject: Re: What are all the ports for DLSw+ ?
Just to add to the mess, remember that DLSW+ is not DLSW.
And DLSWv2 uses 2067, not 2065.
steven.j.nelson@bt.com wrote:
>
> No it's not....
>
> When using priority keyword it's
>
> 2065 high
> 1981 medium
> 1982 normal
> 1983 low
>
> Steve
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Harish DV/peakxv [mailto:harish.dv@peakxv.net]
> Sent: 20 June 2002 10:20
> To: McCallum, Robert
> Cc: Anthony Pace; ccielab@groupstudy.com; 'elping';
> nobody@groupstudy.com; tr@contract.hu
> Subject: RE: What are all the ports for DLSw+ ?
>
> Hi..
>
> Its 1981/1982/1983 (medium/normal/high priporities respectively).
> where did you see 1984?.
>
> Harish
>
>
>
> "McCallum, Robert"
>
> <Robert.McCallum@let-it-b To:
"'elping'"
> <elpingu@acedsl.com>, Anthony Pace <anthonypace@fastmail.fm>
> e-thus.com> cc:
> tr@contract.hu, ccielab@groupstudy.com
>
> Sent by: Subject: RE:
What
> are all the ports for DLSw+ ?
> nobody@groupstudy.com
>
>
>
>
>
> 06/20/2002 01:25 AM
>
> Please respond to
>
> "McCallum, Robert"
>
>
>
>
>
> Folks,
>
> The default port number used by DLSW is 2065. If you specify the
keyword
> priority in the DLSW peer statement then this opens up 1982, 1982,
1983 and
> 1984. If there is no priority keyword and you specify in an
access-list
> any other number other than 2065 I would say - if this was in an exam
like
> -
> that you were 100% wrong.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: elping [mailto:elpingu@acedsl.com]
> Sent: 20 June 2002 06:40
> To: Anthony Pace
> Cc: tr@contract.hu; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Re: What are all the ports for DLSw+ ?
>
> ok without looking
> 1981
> 1982
> 2065
> 2067
>
> let's see if i am getting rusty
>
> Anthony Pace wrote:
>
> > I see tcp(2065) and udp(2067) hitting my ACL but I imagine this is
just
> > to set up the peers. If traffic were passing through a circuit does
it
> > use tcp(1981-83). Does it use different ports for SNA versus
NetBios?
> >
> > Does FST use prot-id 91 for every thing?
> >
> > Anthony Pace
> >
> > On Thu, 06 Jun 2002 19:35:14 +0200 (CEST), tr@contract.hu said:
> > > more detailed at:
> > >
> > >
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/cc/pd/ibsw/ibdlsw/prodlit/dlsw5_rg.htm
> > >
> > >
> > > Quoting Carlos G Mendioroz <tron@huapi.ba.ar>:
> > >
> > > > You'have to use priority in dlsw+ to separate 4 queues,
> > > > and use SAP ACLs to separate netbios from SNA into
> > > > different TCP ports (2065/1981/1982/1983).
> > > > Finally, use CQ to separate IPX, and 2 dlsw+ ports...
> > > >
> > > > "Hung, Sing-Yu" wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Dear,
> > > > >
> > > > > Can Someone tell me how to do dlsw traffic queueing as
> > > > below?
> > > > > SNA 50%(packet size 1024)
> > > > > IPX 25%(packet size 512)
> > > > > netbios 25%(packet size 256)
> > > > >
> > > > > I don't know how to define netbios and ipx under queue-list
> > > > >
> > > > > Bradford Hung
> > > > >
> > > > > Pacific Century CyberWorks
> > > > >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Jul 02 2002 - 08:12:38 GMT-3