From: elping (elpingu@xxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sat Jul 06 2002 - 17:41:39 GMT-3
that is ever sweeter ....never played with this before....
from my quick read sound like it would do the job.....
dwclemons wrote:
> How about this config on a e0 10 Meg interface interface
>
> policy-map dlsw
> class cisco
> priority 3000
>
> class-map cisco
> match access-group 101
>
> access-list 101 permit tcp any any eq 2065
>
> int e0
> service-policy output dlsw
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "elping" <elpingu@acedsl.com>
> To: "John White" <jan_white7@hotmail.com>
> Cc: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Saturday, July 06, 2002 3:49 PM
> Subject: Re: Dlsw queueing methods
>
> > ok...le me give it a shot.....please correct any mistakes
> > .
> > since the question asks allow dlsw 30% only lets's use CAR..
> > total speed 10megbits
> > allow 3mbits for dlsw
> >
> > normal burst= CIR [bps] * (1 byte)/(8 bits) * 1.5 seconds
> > settting normal burst = BE disables bursting
> >
> > interface FastEthernet0/0
> > ip address 192.168.1.34 255.255.255.255
> > rate-limit output access-group 101 3000000 375000 375000 conform-action
> > continue exceed-action drop
> > duplex half
> > speed 10
> >
> > access-list 101 permit tcp any any eq 2065
> >
> >
> > John White wrote:
> >
> > > That's fine. But which queueing method would you use, to restirict dlsw
> to
> > > certain maximum bandwith? Is it custom queueing or policing-CAR. I'm
> really
> > > confused on issue
> > > Jan
> > >
> > > >From: elping <elpingu@acedsl.com>
> > > >Reply-To: elping <elpingu@acedsl.com>
> > > >To: John White <jan_white7@hotmail.com>
> > > >CC: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > > >Subject: Re: Dlsw queueing methods
> > > >Date: Sat, 06 Jul 2002 11:56:41 -0400
> > > >
> > > >I was confused by this as well:
> > > >to make it simple use
> > > >
> > > >only spcify port 2065 for dlsw...
> > > >
> > > >the other ports are used if you used priority
> > > >
> > > >John White wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi guys,
> > > > > I'm new to the group, so I started browsing archives recently. There
> is
> > > >a
> > > > > lot good stuff there.Some questions though seems to never recive
> > > >answers.I
> > > > > guess people use their privite e-mail accounts, instead of list.I
> notice
> > > >,
> > > > > that in May 2002 there was discusion going on regarding bandwith
> > > >allocation
> > > > > for DLSw . The question was which method to use in order to allocate
> > > >DlSw no
> > > > > more than 30% of interface bandwith. (token or ehternet). Is it
> custom
> > > > > queueing or CAR or CBWFQ?.Does it require to specify all 4 ports for
> > > >traffic
> > > > > or not (2065, 1981,1982,1983)
> > > > > Thanks in advance
> > > > > Jan
> > > > >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Sep 07 2002 - 19:36:20 GMT-3