From: Paglia, John (USPC.PCT.Hopewell) (JPaglia@xxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Tue Jul 09 2002 - 23:39:10 GMT-3
You don't have to construct VLAN's just to satisfy IPX encaps. You have the
VLAN set up on the main interface, then create subs w/ the differing IPX
networks and encaps, and you're good to go.
Pags
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Anthony Pace [SMTP:anthonypace@fastmail.fm]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 9:22 PM
> To: Prakash H Somani; Nick Shah
> Cc: Todd Carswell; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Re: Re: IPX EIGRP Autonomous System Discovery -- Is it
> possible?
>
> I saw this IPX thread and it provoked some questions.
>
> What is IPX NETWORK DISCOVERY? IS it a way to have an interface
> synamically gain an IPX network number?
>
> Also, If you use sub-interfaces instead of secondaries to support
> different encapsulations and your media is Ethernet, does this mean you
> need to create multiple VLANs for each sub-interace and segrate the A1
> network onto one "wire" and the B2 network onto another "wire"?
>
> If this were a lab I would say that would work but in real life the
> reason you might need one wore to have different networks and
> encapsulations because several were allready on one wire. Is this there
> a way to do the sub-interfaces where it is all still one big "wire"?
>
> Anthony Pace
>
>
>
>
> On 9 Jul 2002 15:15:43 -0000, "Prakash H Somani"
> <pdsccie@rediffmail.com> said:
> > Hi Nick....
> >
> > It works....find
> >
> > A. Debug output
> >
> > *Mar 6 04:09:29.498: IPXRIP: Marking network 222 FFFFFFFF for
> > Flash Update
> > *Mar 6 04:09:29.502: IPXRIP: General Query
> > src=222.00b0.64db.be20, dst=222.ffff
> > .ffff.ffff, packet sent (via Ethernet0/0)
> > *Mar 6 04:09:29.510: IPXRIP: positing flash update to
> > 22.ffff.ffff.ffff via Loo
> > pback0 (broadcast)
> > *Mar 6 04:09:29.510: IPXRIP: positing flash update to
> > 222.ffff.ffff.ffff via Et
> > hernet0/0 (broadcast)
> > *Mar 6 04:09:29.514: IPXRIP: positing full update to
> > 222.ffff.ffff.ffff via Eth
> > ernet0/0 (broadcast)
> > *Mar 6 04:09:29.566: IPX:
> > Lo0:22.0002.0002.0002->22.ffff.ffff.ffff ln= 40 tc=00
> > pt=01 ds=0453 ss=0453, rcvd
> > *Mar 6 04:09:29.566: IPX:
> > Lo0:22.0002.0002.0002->22.ffff.ffff.ffff ln= 40 tc=00
> > pt=01 ds=0453 ss=0453, bad pkt
> > *Mar 6 04:09:29.566: IPXRIP: suppressing null update to
> > 222.ffff.ffff.ffff (Eth
> > ernet0/0)
> > R2(config-if)#
> > *Mar 6 04:10:14.928: IPX:
> > Et0/0:5.00d0.58ad.27f1->5.ffff.ffff.ffff ln= 40 tc=00
> > pt=01 ds=0453 ss=0453, rcvd
> > *Mar 6 04:10:14.928: IPX:
> > Et0/0:5.00d0.58ad.27f1->5.ffff.ffff.ffff ln= 40 tc=00
> > pt=01 ds=0453 ss=0453, bad pkt
> > *Mar 6 04:10:27.429: IPXRIP: positing full update to
> > 22.ffff.ffff.ffff via Loop
> > back0 (broadcast)
> > *Mar 6 04:10:27.437: IPX:
> > Lo0:22.0002.0002.0002->22.ffff.ffff.ffff ln= 40 tc=00
> > pt=01 ds=0453 ss=0453, rcvd
> > *Mar 6 04:10:27.437: IPX:
> > Lo0:22.0002.0002.0002->22.ffff.ffff.ffff ln= 40 tc=00
> > pt=01 ds=0453 ss=0453, bad pkt
> > *Mar 6 04:10:29.348: IPXRIP: positing full update to
> > 222.ffff.ffff.ffff via Eth
> > ernet0/0 (broadcast)
> >
> > B. Configuration details
> >
> > R5#sh runn int e0
> > Building configuration...
> >
> > Current configuration:
> > !
> > interface Ethernet0
> > ip address 150.50.50.2 255.255.255.240 secondary
> > ip address 172.16.45.5 255.255.255.248
> > no ip directed-broadcast
> > no ip split-horizon eigrp 100
> > ipx network 5 encapsulation SAP
> > end
> >
> > R2#sh run int e0/0
> > Building configuration...
> >
> > Current configuration:
> > !
> > interface Ethernet0/0
> > ip address 172.16.45.2 255.255.255.248
> > no ip directed-broadcast
> > ipx network 222 encapsulation SAP
> > end
> >
> > regards....Prakash
> >
> > On Tue, 09 Jul 2002 Nick Shah wrote :
> > >There was a post in the archives, which allowed for a method
> > >(coupled with
> > >debug ip packet) to find the IP EIGRP AS ##, but nothing that I
> > >know of for
> > >IPX eigrp.
> > >
> > >Btw, I juggled (read struggled :) a bit trying to get the ipx
> > >network
> > >discovery.. I tried the following but somehow couldnt get it to
> > >work...
> > >
> > >* create sub-ifs with different encapsulations, and assign
> > >different ipx
> > >networks to it
> > >* turn on debug ipx sap , debug ipx packet, debug ipx routing (I
> > >think)
> > >*but it showed me everything except what I wanted (bad IPX
> > >network etc.
> > >etc.)
> > >
> > >I used secondary ipx addresses (in lieu of sub interfaces), used
> > >ipx eigrp,
> > >ipx rip & even NLSP.. but no luck..
> > >
> > >rgds
> > >Nick
> > >----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Todd Carswell" <acarswell@nc.rr.com>
> > >To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> > >Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 1:23 PM
> > >Subject: IPX EIGRP Autonomous System Discovery -- Is it
> > >possible?
> > >
> > >
> > > > Hi all,
> > > >
> > > > I can do IPX NETWORK discovery. It made me wonder...
> > > >
> > > > Is it possible to discover a neighboring IPX EIGRP Autonomous
> > >System
> > >Number?
> > > >
> > > > Thx
> > > >
> > > > Todd Carswell
> > > >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Sep 07 2002 - 19:36:24 GMT-3