From: Colin Barber (Colin.Barber@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu Jul 11 2002 - 05:15:26 GMT-3
I would have R1 set as promiscuous and therefore the dlsw remote-peer is not
required.
Colin
-----Original Message-----
From: lao ya li [mailto:hulaoya@yahoo.com.cn]
Sent: 10 July 2002 04:31
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: dlsw remote-peer tcp and dynamic option
HI Friend,
r1:dlsw remote-peer 0 tcp ip-address of r2
r2:dlsw remote-peer 0 tcp ip-address of r1 dynamic
I think :
Above configuration is meaningless.Dynamic should be used at both routers.
it is wrong that one router uses the dynamic and the other side route does
not use the dynamic.
dlsw remote-peer 0 tcp ip-address of r2 should changed as dlsw remote-peer
0 tcp ip-address of r2 dynamic
Any comment is welcome for this configuration!
rgds//lao ya
---------------------------------
Do You Yahoo!?
RxPP>^M7>[;aVPT- 4s@KLT!.=p!/K-=+P&0A?
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Sep 07 2002 - 19:36:26 GMT-3