Re: ospf process-id

From: Hansang Bae (hbae@xxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Mon Jul 15 2002 - 23:12:03 GMT-3

• Next message: Katson PN Yeung: "Re: what is better -- "No Show" or "Go Unprepared""
• Previous message: Ahmed Mamoor Amimi: "Re: Default route over ISDN"
• Maybe in reply to: zlf: "ospf process-id"
• Next in thread: Przemyslaw Karwasiecki: "Re: ospf process-id"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

   
At 12:12 PM 7/25/2002 +0800, zlf wrote:
>In ospf configuration we can set two or more process-id is a router,but i don'
t know what's the situation use it and what's the really function we use more p
rocess-id in ospf.

So you can run two OSPF instances on the router w/o it redistributing automatic
ally.

Or to have two separate LS databases for financial, political, or other techni
cal reasons.

hsb

• Next message: Katson PN Yeung: "Re: what is better -- "No Show" or "Go Unprepared""
• Previous message: Ahmed Mamoor Amimi: "Re: Default route over ISDN"
• Maybe in reply to: zlf: "ospf process-id"
• Next in thread: Przemyslaw Karwasiecki: "Re: ospf process-id"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Sep 07 2002 - 19:36:31 GMT-3