From: Tom Larus (tlarus@xxxxxxx)
Date: Thu Jul 18 2002 - 10:41:12 GMT-3
"line con 0"
>>"no exec"... ;-)
Speaking of "no exec," I noticed recently in a config that one could use "no
exec-timeout" instead of exec-t 0 0. I wonder for a few minutes why I had
seen this before. It took me a few minutes to realize why this is not a
good way to disable your exec-timeout feature. It is very easy for "no
exec-ti" to be cut short by a fat-fingered carriage return and become "no
exec."
I am lucky that I never decided to try this method, because at the time I
was pproaching my first attempt and would not have wanted to spare even five
minutes for rebooting and changing the config-register so I could get into
the router and undo that command.
Tom Larus
----- Original Message -----
From: "David Luu" <wicked01@ix.netcom.com>
To: "Manny Gonzalez" <manny@nyp.org>; "Brian Dennis" <brian@5g.net>
Cc: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 2:21 AM
Subject: Re: ACL fewest numbers of lines
> VI editor? man was that a pain the first time i had to learn it, but it
> became a powerful tool once i got used to it
>
> At 11:44 PM 7/17/2002 -0400, Manny Gonzalez wrote:
> >A favorite "trip over the power cord trick" (a.k.a Router#test crash)
> >It is a very useful command.... especially when you have bosses that LOVE
> >change control (ugh!) ;-)
> >
> >One more wish, when is IOS gonna have VI built in to edit text files in
> >FLASH?? Hey, one can hope...
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Sep 07 2002 - 19:36:35 GMT-3