2 static routes or HSRP

From: Krucker, Louis (louis.krucker@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Fri Jul 19 2002 - 18:20:17 GMT-3

Next message: Jaspreet Bhatia: "Re: First attempt failed in San Jose"
Previous message: Cary Anderson: "RE: cheap atm lab for r&s"
Next in thread: Hansang Bae: "Re: 2 static routes or HSRP"
Maybe reply: Hansang Bae: "Re: 2 static routes or HSRP"
Maybe reply: Krucker, Louis: "RE: 2 static routes or HSRP"
Maybe reply: kym blair: "RE: 2 static routes or HSRP"
Maybe reply: Hansang Bae: "RE: 2 static routes or HSRP"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Hi folks

I ran in a interesting issue today and whant ask you which is
the better solution.

Heres the scenarion.

cat5k - | _
   _ |---|_|-----
  |_| - | R1 Internet Backbone
        | _
        |---|_|-----
             R2

Lets say my cat must be reachable via the ethernet link, R1 and R2s links
pointing to the BB. For connectivity i have to put 2 static default routes
on the cat pointing to the ethernet ports to make sure if one port goes down
the cat is still reachable. There is a working solution also with HSRP. My
question now which solution scales more ?

any comments are welcome....

regards
Louis

Next message: Jaspreet Bhatia: "Re: First attempt failed in San Jose"
Previous message: Cary Anderson: "RE: cheap atm lab for r&s"
Next in thread: Hansang Bae: "Re: 2 static routes or HSRP"
Maybe reply: Hansang Bae: "Re: 2 static routes or HSRP"
Maybe reply: Krucker, Louis: "RE: 2 static routes or HSRP"
Maybe reply: kym blair: "RE: 2 static routes or HSRP"
Maybe reply: Hansang Bae: "RE: 2 static routes or HSRP"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Sep 07 2002 - 19:36:37 GMT-3