From: Fanglo MA (fangloma@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu Aug 08 2002 - 09:26:31 GMT-3
One more interesting is: if after passing CCIE one or two years, a group
of CCIEs prepare to open business on lab-book or bootcamp. Would they
be NDA concerned? While the lab format or even the content might/might
not been changed. Any input?
Regards,
Fanglo
On Thu, 8 Aug 2002, Michael Snyder wrote:
> Sounds like a feedback loop.
>
> When the frequency of a radio signal drifts, the phased locked loop of
> the tuner will resettle to the new signal frequency.
>
> When the lab content changes, the questions in the forum changes, till
> the active members of Groupstudy resettle to study the new content.
>
>
> Is this a NDA problem? Maybe, BUT maybe not!
>
> For example, when a CCIE passes his test, then writes a studyguide a
> year later, he is using all of knowledge he has learned to write the
> studyguide. Are studyguides a NDA problem? No, because Cisco publishes
> them, therefore any content in such a guide could never be an NDA
> problem.
>
> Another example, a while back, when a new CCIE posted his pass message,
> he posted in the message that IGRP was the devil. Which I could deduce
> that the gentleman had IGRP on his exam, and it caused him great
> problems. Because of this feedback message, I broke out my books a
> reviewed IGRP.
>
> Is the above a text book example of a NDA violation? Lets think about
> it, it was already general knowledge that IGRP was on the exam. It is
> also general knowledge that IGRP is hard to work with. Third point,
> Cisco has posted a message that IGRP is being removed from the exam,
> which means that must have been there in the first place.
>
> I cite the above to reinforce my point that Groupstudy is in a phased
> locked feedback loop with the lab exam, if fact in order to help each
> other to study, it must have that relationship with the exam in order to
> be effective.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: lrlab [mailto:lrlab@swbell.net]
> Sent: Thursday, August 08, 2002 8:34 AM
> To: syv; Michael Snyder
> Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Re: 200 per month.
>
> I agree with a few exceptions. I think as a group we are developing
> better
> sutdy practices but I also think that there is some cheating going on.
> Just
> watch the numbers. When the pass rate gets to around 100 per week the
> questions on the group are all answered for the most part and people are
> just tweeking the answers. Then out of the clear blue sky a new batch
> of
> questions start poping up, at that same time the pass number drops to 40
> -50
> per week. look at the last time that happned (july 27/28). It seems
> to be
> a trend.
>
>
> Just my 2 cents
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Sep 07 2002 - 19:48:20 GMT-3