From: Fred Ingham (fingham@xxxxxxx)
Date: Tue Aug 20 2002 - 00:08:54 GMT-3
The configuration guides still have ipxwan as a configuration step in
enabling ipx nlsp over a point-to-point serial interface. It works without
the ipxwan but the costs are different when configuring with ipxwan and when
just using ipx enable nlsp. If asked to configure it I would use ipxwan.
When using ipxwan there is no network number assigned to the interface.
Fred
----- Original Message -----
From: "ccie candidate" <ccie1@lycos.com>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Monday, August 19, 2002 11:40 AM
Subject: NLSP and IPXWAN
> folks;
> when running nlsp over wan (serial ) one must use ipxwan ...right ??
>
> i read this somewhere multiple times ...i beleive it is right unless
someone has different opinion .
>
>
> when i config ipxwan i noticed that the network of the ipxwan link didnt
show up in the far end routers ..is this normal ???
>
>
> say
> R1-----R2------R3
>
> R1R2 connection is serial running ipxwan ,while R2R3 is ethernet.
>
> on r1
> int ser 0
> ipx ipxwan aa 12 r1
> !
> on r2
> int ser 0
> ipx ipxwan bb 12 r2
> !
>
> now NLSP is running for R1 ,R2,R3
>
>
> on R3 , the network 12 didnt show up ..however the internal network AA and
BB showed normally ...
>
>
> is this normal ?
>
>
>
>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Sep 07 2002 - 19:48:30 GMT-3