Re: NLSP and IPXWAN

From: Fred Ingham (fingham@xxxxxxx)
Date: Tue Aug 20 2002 - 23:39:50 GMT-3


   
Full configurations with and without ipxwan configured together with the ipx
routing tables are attached. AFAIK the attachment will be deleted by
Groupstudy but you should get it at your address. A short answer for no
ipxwan is:

hostname R1
!
ipx routing 0001.0001.0001
ipx internal-network A1
!
interface Serial0/0.14 point-to-point
 ipx network 14
 ipx nlsp enable
 ipx nlsp rip off
 ipx nlsp sap off
 frame-relay interface-dlci 104
!
ipx router nlsp
 area-address 0 0
 no redistribute rip
end
*****************************************
hostname R4
!
ipx routing 0004.0004.0004
ipx internal-network A4
!
interface Serial0.14 point-to-point
  ipx network 14
 ipx nlsp enable
 ipx nlsp rip off
 ipx nlsp sap off
 frame-relay interface-dlci 401
!
ipx router nlsp
 area-address 0 0
 no redistribute rip
end

Cheers, Fred
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mingzhou Nie" <mnie@yahoo.com>
To: "Fred Ingham" <fingham@cox.net>; <ccie1@lycos.com>;
<ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2002 9:39 PM
Subject: Re: NLSP and IPXWAN

> Fred,
>
> Do you have sample configs for nlsp on WAN w/o ipxwan? I couldn't get
> it work.
>
> r131
>
> interface Serial2/0
> no ip address
> ipx network 7878
> ipx nlsp enable
> !
> ipx router nlsp
> !
> !
> ipx router rip
> no network 7878
>
>
> --- Fred Ingham <fingham@cox.net> wrote:
> > The IPXWAN network number is only used in the ipxwan packet exchanges
> > and
> > does not get propagated. The network number can be different on
> > either end
> > . The router that is the master will dictate the actual network
> > number used
> > in the exchange.
> >
> > For instance, R1 is configured as ipx ipxwan a1 14 R1, R4 is
> > configured as
> > ipx ipxwan a4 144 R4, NLSP is enabled, RIP/SAP are disabled. R4 with
> > the
> > higher internal address (a4 vs. a1) will become the master and will
> > dictate
> > that 144 is the network number to be used in ipxwan packets. In the
> > R1 ipx
> > route table, 144 is the W network. From R1 an IPX ping to
> > 144.0000.00a4.0000 works as does a ping to 144.0000.00a1.0000 in the
> > other
> > direction. Use sh ipx interface to see the addresses and the
> > master-slave
> > relationship.
> >
> > R3 is another NLSP router and does not see either 14 or 144 as you
> > observed
> > in your original note. This is normal.
> >
> > Debug below captured on r4.
> >
> > 1w0d: IPXWAN: Rcv TIMER_REQ on Serial0.14/A4:144, NodeID A1, Seq 0
> > 1w0d: IPXWAN: Send TIMER_REQ [seq 1] out Serial0.14/A4:144
> > 1w0d: IPXWAN: offer TIMER_REQ routing options NLSP
> > 1w0d: IPXWAN: Rcv TIMER_RSP on Serial0.14/A4:144, NodeID A1, Seq 1,
> > Del 38
> > 1w0d: IPXWAN: Rcv TIMER_RSP accept as MASTER NLSP on Serial0.14
> > 1w0d: IPXWAN: state (Sending Timer Requests -> Master: Sent
> > Throughput)
> > [Serial0
> > .14/A4:144 (Received Timer Response as master)]
> > 1w0d: IPXWAN: Send NLSP THROUGHPUT [seq 0] out Serial0.14/A4:144
> > 1w0d: IPXWAN: Rcv THROUGHPUT response from Serial0.14/A4:144, NodeID
> > A1, Seq
> > 0
> > 1w0d: IPXWAN: Send NLSP THROUGHPUT [seq 1] out Serial0.14/A4:144
> > 1w0d: IPXWAN: Throughput size 576 delta 64000
> > 1w0d: IPXWAN: Rcv THROUGHPUT response from Serial0.14/A4:144, NodeID
> > A1, Seq
> > 1
> > 1w0d: IPXWAN: state (Master: Sent Throughput -> Master: Sent Delay)
> > [Serial0.14/
> > A4:144 (Received Second Throughput Response )]
> > 1w0d: IPXWAN: Throughput size 576 delta 64000
> > 1w0d: IPXWAN: Send NLSP DELAY [seq 0] out Serial0.14/A4:144
> > 1w0d: IPXWAN: Rcv DELAY_RSP from Serial0.14/A4:144, NodeID A1, Seq 0
> > 1w0d: IPXWAN: Send NLSP DELAY [seq 0] out Serial0.14/A4:144
> > 1w0d: IPXWAN: Rcv DELAY_RSP from Serial0.14/A4:144, NodeID A1, Seq 0
> > 1w0d: IPXWAN: Rcv DELAY_RSP Delay1 384, Delay2 372, thru 72000
> > 1w0d: IPXWAN: state (Master: Sent Delay -> Master: Sent Router Info)
> > [Serial0.14
> > /A4:144 (Received Second Delay Response)]
> > 1w0d: IPXWAN: Send ROUTING_INFO_REQ [seq 0] out Serial0.14/A4:144
> > 1w0d: IPXWAN: NLSP delay 1000000, throughput 72000
> > 1w0d: IPXWAN: Rcv ROUTING_INFO_RSP from Serial0.14/A4:144, NodeID A1,
> > Seq 0
> > 1w0d: IPXWAN: NLSP delay 1000000, throughput 72000
> > 1w0d: IPXWAN: state (Master: Sent Router Info -> Master: Connect)
> > [Serial0.14/A4
> > :144 (Received Router Info Rsp as Master)]
> >
> > This follows the diagram on p.447 of Chappell, Novell's Guide to
> > LAN/WAN
> > Analysis: IPX/SPX
> >
> > Hope this answers your original question.
> > Fred
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "ccie candidate" <ccie1@lycos.com>
> > To: "ccie candidate" <ccie1@lycos.com>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>;
> > "Fred
> > Ingham" <fingham@cox.net>
> > Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2002 12:29 AM
> > Subject: Re: NLSP and IPXWAN
> >
> >
> > > ok i would do the same .
> > > however my question was about the network assigned by the IPXWAN
> > command
> > >
> > > ipx ipxwan 0 16 R1
> > >
> > > where 16 is the assigned network for the link by the command ( or i
> > understand it like that )
> > >
> > > this network shows in the routing table as "W" however it dont
> > propagate
> > with NLSP
> > >
> > > any comments
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > On Mon, 19 Aug 2002 23:08:54
> > > Fred Ingham wrote:
> > > >The configuration guides still have ipxwan as a configuration step
> > in
> > > >enabling ipx nlsp over a point-to-point serial interface. It
> > works
> > without
> > > >the ipxwan but the costs are different when configuring with
> > ipxwan and
> > when
> > > >just using ipx enable nlsp. If asked to configure it I would use
> > ipxwan.
> > > >When using ipxwan there is no network number assigned to the
> > interface.
> > > >
> > > >Fred
> > > >----- Original Message -----
> > > >From: "ccie candidate" <ccie1@lycos.com>
> > > >To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> > > >Sent: Monday, August 19, 2002 11:40 AM
> > > >Subject: NLSP and IPXWAN
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> folks;
> > > >> when running nlsp over wan (serial ) one must use ipxwan
> > ...right ??
> > > >>
> > > >> i read this somewhere multiple times ...i beleive it is right
> > unless
> > > >someone has different opinion .
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> when i config ipxwan i noticed that the network of the ipxwan
> > link
> > didnt
> > > >show up in the far end routers ..is this normal ???
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> say
> > > >> R1-----R2------R3
> > > >>
> > > >> R1R2 connection is serial running ipxwan ,while R2R3 is
> > ethernet.
> > > >>
> > > >> on r1
> > > >> int ser 0
> > > >> ipx ipxwan aa 12 r1
> > > >> !
> > > >> on r2
> > > >> int ser 0
> > > >> ipx ipxwan bb 12 r2
> > > >> !
> > > >>
> > > >> now NLSP is running for R1 ,R2,R3
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> on R3 , the network 12 didnt show up ..however the internal
> > network AA
> > and
> > > >BB showed normally ...
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> is this normal ?
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Sep 07 2002 - 19:48:31 GMT-3