From: Nick Shah (nshah@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Wed Aug 21 2002 - 04:41:59 GMT-3
   
Yes, 10 mins, after posting the original post, I realised that fact.
So I have reposted the reply.
rgds
Nick
----- Original Message -----
From: Donny MATEO <donny.mateo@sg.ca-indosuez.com>
To: Nick Shah <nshah@connect.com.au>
Cc: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2002 5:12 PM
Subject: Re: Lab 2 Question about redistributing OSPF into BGP and allowin g
on lydefault route.
>
> Hi Nick,
>
> I'm reading a document at
> htt://www.cisco.com/warp/public/104/bgp-ospf-redis.html
>
> it says " The default behavior is to not redistribute any routes from OSPF
into BGP. In other words,
> the simple redistribute command, such as redistribute ospf 1 under router
bgp 1 does not work.
> Specific keywords like internal external and nssa-external are requried".
>
> Can anybody verify this ?
>
> Best Regards
> Donny
>
>
>
>                       "Nick Shah"
>                       <nshah@connect.co        To:       "Jim Brown"
<Jim.Brown@caselogic.com>, <jim.phillipo@guardent.com>,
>                       m.au>                     <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>                       Sent by:                 cc:
>                       nobody@groupstudy        Subject:  Re: Lab 2
Question about redistributing OSPF into BGP and  allowin g on ly
>                       .com                      default route.
>
>
>                       21-08-2002 08:01
>                       Please respond to
>                       "Nick Shah"
>
>
>
>
>
>
> when redistributing OSPF into BGP, by default, only INTERNAL routes get
> redistributed.
> So to redistribute ospf E1 & E2 routes into BGP, you need to specify them
> explicitly.
>
> rgds
> Nick
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Jim Brown <Jim.Brown@caselogic.com>
> To: <jim.phillipo@guardent.com>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2002 9:06 AM
> Subject: RE: Lab 2 Question about redistributing OSPF into BGP and allowin
g
> on ly default route.
>
>
> > Doesn't the access list and route map deny the default and permit
> everything
> > else? This is why you need the internal external 1 and 2.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: jim.phillipo@guardent.com [mailto:jim.phillipo@guardent.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2002 4:54 PM
> > To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > Subject: Lab 2 Question about redistributing OSPF into BGP and allowing
on
> > ly default route.
> >
> >
> > As far as I see it the purpose of the route map is to only allow the
> default
> > route to be re distributed into BGP.
> >
> > I am a little confused as to how access ist 1 and 2 is having this
effect.
> >
> > Any input apreciated.
> >
> > Also is it necassary to match internal external 1 external 2 to have
this
> > work ?
> >
> > !
> > router ospf 2
> >  log-adjacency-changes
> >  area 0 authentication message-digest
> >  network 12.2.1.1 0.0.0.0 area 0
> >  default-information originate always metric 20
> > !
> > router bgp 3
> >  no synchronization
> >  bgp log-neighbor-changes
> >  redistribute ospf 2 match internal external 1 external 2 route-map
> filter1
> >  neighbor 11.1.1.5 remote-as 2
> >  neighbor 11.1.1.5 route-map setlocal in
> >  neighbor 12.2.1.2 remote-as 3
> >  neighbor 12.2.1.2 password en cisco
> > !
> > ip kerberos source-interface any
> > ip classless
> > ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 11.1.1.5
> > no ip http server
> > !
> > access-list 1 permit 0.0.0.0
> > access-list 2 permit any
> > !
> > route-map filter1 deny 10
> >  match ip address 1
> > !
> > route-map filter1 permit 20
> >  match ip address 2
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Sep 07 2002 - 19:48:31 GMT-3