RE: ipx tunneling

From: Colin Barber (Colin.Barber@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Mon Aug 26 2002 - 05:50:38 GMT-3

• Next message: steven.j.nelson@xxxxxx: "RE: ipx tunneling"
• Previous message: Colin Barber: "RE: Multicast Problems"
• Maybe in reply to: Putti Dhamrongsirivadh: "ipx tunneling"
• Next in thread: steven.j.nelson@xxxxxx: "RE: ipx tunneling"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

   
Tunnelling is correct.

R1
Int ser0
  ip address 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.252
Int Tunnel 0
  ipx network CC
  tunnel source 192.168.1.1 (or tunnel source serial 0)
  tunnel destination 192.168.1.2

R2
Int ser0
  ip address 192.168.1.2 255.255.255.252
Int Tunnel 0
  ipx network CC
  tunnel source 192.168.1.2
  tunnel destination 192.168.1.1

Both routers will communicate IPX with each other over network CC (tunnel
interface).

Colin

-----Original Message-----
From: Putti Dhamrongsirivadh [mailto:putti@ait.co.th]
Sent: 26 August 2002 23:28
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: ipx tunneling

Hi

I have a scenario:

ipx net AA no ipx network ipx net BB
--------------R1----------------------R2--------------
               e0 s0 s0 e0

How can we configure R1 and R2 so that R2 can see ipx net AA in ipx routing
table? I heard that we need to use tunneling between R1 and R2. Is that
correct? Could someone give me a sample configuration?

thanks,
Putti

• Next message: steven.j.nelson@xxxxxx: "RE: ipx tunneling"
• Previous message: Colin Barber: "RE: Multicast Problems"
• Maybe in reply to: Putti Dhamrongsirivadh: "ipx tunneling"
• Next in thread: steven.j.nelson@xxxxxx: "RE: ipx tunneling"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Sep 07 2002 - 19:48:37 GMT-3