RE: DHCP redundancy best practice

From: Joe A (groupstudy@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Wed Aug 28 2002 - 16:19:52 GMT-3


   
Stick to the first method; overlapping the ubnets and tweaking timers
will probably result in a disaster.

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
ccie student
Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 10:05 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: OT: DHCP redundancy best practice

I'm setting up Cisco IOS Telephony (ITS) for a client and using the
routers
to lease dhcp addresses to the ip phones. I have two 2600s for
redundancy
and I split up the subnet between the two routers. Is this the best way
of
doing it? Or should I run one as the 'primary' by increasing the
secondary's ping & packet timeouts and just overlap the subnet?

Any advice is appreciated

Thanks



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Sep 07 2002 - 19:48:40 GMT-3