From: Abdul Waheed Ghaffar (a_w_ghaffar@hotmail.com)
Date: Tue Sep 03 2002 - 05:39:17 GMT-3
Agreed, I think u have to put static route at R12 to R9 ethernet.
>From: sean@ttank.com
>Reply-To: sean@ttank.com
>To: "Volkov, Dmitry (Toronto - BCE)" <dmitry_volkov@ca.ml.com>
>CC: ccielab@groupstudy.com, emonk@att.net, nobody@groupstudy.com
>Subject: RE: local policy routing
>Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2002 23:52:14 -0700
>
>Dmitry,
>
>What you thought is still true, that is a router will source packets from
>IP of interface closest to destination.
>What happens here is, when you ping loopbacks on R12 from R9, neither eth0
>nor ser0 is closer to the
>destinations (7.7.7.7 or 160.160.160.160), by default, IOS sources packets
>from LAN
>interfaces. Then local policy routing kicks in and sends it on to the
>default
>next hop at 50.100.1.12 on R12's ser0. What really fails the pings is
>because R12 does not have
>a return route to R9's eth0 network.
>
>- Sean Liu
>
>CCIE, CCNP, CCDP, CCSE,
>AIX-CATE, CNE, MCSE+I
>
>Think Tank Systems, LLC
>
>
>
>
>
>|--------+------------------------->
>| | "Volkov, Dmitry|
>| | (Toronto - |
>| | BCE)" |
>| | <dmitry_volkov@|
>| | ca.ml.com> |
>| | Sent by: |
>| | nobody@groupstu|
>| | dy.com |
>| | |
>| | |
>| | 09/02/2002 |
>| | 08:45 PM |
>| | Please respond |
>| | to "Volkov, |
>| | Dmitry (Toronto|
>| | - BCE)" |
>| | |
>|--------+------------------------->
>
> >------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
> |
> |
> | To: "'Edward Monk'" <emonk@att.net>
> |
> | cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> |
> | Subject: RE: local policy routing
> |
>
> >------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
>
>
>
>Yes Edward,
>
>On both sides route-map will work.
>That I know..
>I always thought that router sources packets from IP of interface closest
>to
>destination.
>Looks like it depends on type of interface when we have local policy
>enabled
>
>Thanks,
>
>Dmitry
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Edward Monk [mailto:emonk@att.net]
> > Sent: Monday, September 02, 2002 11:37 PM
> > To: 'Volkov, Dmitry (Toronto - BCE)'; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > Subject: RE: local policy routing
> >
> >
> > Dmitry,
> >
> > You need a route back. If you apply the route-map to both
> > sides it will
> > work. The route-map matches all packets so no changes needed.
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On
> > Behalf Of
> > Volkov, Dmitry (Toronto - BCE)
> > Sent: Monday, September 02, 2002 7:28 PM
> > To: 'ccielab@groupstudy.com'
> > Subject: local policy routing
> >
> > Hello group,
> >
> > Could You please explain me what is wrong here R9(s0)----(s0)R12:
> > (I can't ping loopbacks on R12 from R9)
> >
> > R9#
> > interface Ethernet0
> > ip address 170.240.8.1 255.255.255.0
> > !
> > interface Serial0
> > ip address 50.100.1.9 255.255.255.0
> > no fair-queue
> > !
> > ip local policy route-map test
> > ip classless
> > no ip http server
> > !
> > route-map test permit 10
> > set ip default next-hop 50.100.1.12
> >
> > sh ip ro
> > 170.240.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets
> > C 170.240.8.0 is directly connected, Ethernet0
> > 50.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets
> > C 50.100.1.0 is directly connected, Serial0
> > r9#
> >
> >
> > R12#
> > !
> > interface Loopback0
> > ip address 7.7.7.7 255.255.255.0
> > !
> > interface Loopback1
> > ip address 160.160.160.160 255.255.255.0
> > !
> > interface Serial0
> > ip address 50.100.1.12 255.255.255.0
> > !
> > ip classless
> > no ip http server
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Dmitry
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > Commercial lab list: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/commercial.html
> > Please discuss commercial lab solutions on this list.
>_________________________________________________________________
>Commercial lab list: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/commercial.html
>Please discuss commercial lab solutions on this list.
>_________________________________________________________________
>Commercial lab list: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/commercial.html
>Please discuss commercial lab solutions on this list.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Oct 07 2002 - 07:43:42 GMT-3