RE: OT on white papers (was Re: OSPF over EIGRP !!!!

From: steven.j.nelson@bt.com
Date: Fri Sep 06 2002 - 16:45:15 GMT-3


Dave

You are a world of useful information!

Nice one.

Steve

-----Original Message-----
From: MADMAN [mailto:dave@interprise.com]
Sent: 06 September 2002 20:13
To: Howard C. Berkowitz
Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: OT on white papers (was Re: OSPF over EIGRP !!!!

Q. Where does the name come from?

The etymology of the term dates back to Britain in 1899, when it meant a
government report on policy (such as a position paper). A white paper
stated
a problem, covered some background (history), and then proposed a
solution
(a new law, etc.). At some point in the 1970s this term was co-opted by
high
tech. It become a technical paper put out by a company, dealing with a
specific technical area and general problem, with background, and a
solution.

  Dave

"Howard C. Berkowitz" wrote:
>
> At 3:02 PM +0100 9/6/02, Derek Gaff wrote:
> >Hi Madman
> >
> >This is my point, having a routing protocol that is easy to implement is
not
> >my kind of explanation. Think of it this way beside the easy
configuration
> >part.
> >
> >If I had White Paper and Cream Paper what is the best one to draw a
picture
> >on, white because your use to drawing on it, or cream cause its nice to
use,
> >whats the argument to use one over the other, ??????.
> >
> >regards'
> >Derek
>
> As a bit of trivia, anyone know the historical reason white papers
> are called white papers? Why were there green, pink, and other
> colored papers at the time white papers were introduced?
>
> This is distinct from the reason that a different organization uses
> flimsies, buffs, greens, and redstripes.

-- 
David Madland
CCIE# 2016
Sr. Network Engineer
Qwest Communications
612-664-3367

"You don't make the poor richer by making the rich poorer." --Winston Churchill



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Oct 07 2002 - 07:43:45 GMT-3