From: Omer Ansari (omer@ansari.com)
Date: Thu Sep 12 2002 - 20:24:08 GMT-3
OK, so the example shows RTC has a neighbor command with a
router in AS70. [didnt notice in haste]
however, i still stand by my hypothesis.
On Fri, 13 Sep 2002, Omer Ansari wrote:
> I beg to differ.
>
> if you dont have all the sub-ASes in the bgp confederation peers, how
> would you know if the routes coming via an AS are from outside or from
> within the confederation?
>
> i think you have to have all the sub-ASes listed in the bgp confed peers
> (even if they are not adjoint)
>
> see bgp case study:
> http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/459/16.html#A23.0
>
> RtC is not directly connected to AS70 but still has as70 in the bgp confed
> peers statement, for routes coming from/via as70, how would rtc know if
> its from within the confederation or outside, if it doesnt know who all is
> in in the confederation?
>
> regards,
> Omer
>
>
> On Fri, 13 Sep 2002, [iso-8859-1] Lim Meng Toon wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Usually you only need to peer to those routers within
> > the confederation as required and not to every peers.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > --- Peng Zheng <zpnist@yahoo.com> wrote: > Hi,
> > >
> > > Should I only specify AS peers which are directly
> > > connected with local router or Specify all ASs that
> > > belong to the confederation?
> > >
> > > IN CIM BGP, they specify all ASs. But I remember I
> > > saw some examples only specify ASs directly
> > > connected.
> > >
> > >
> > > Which one should be used?
> > >
> > > Thank you for help.
> > >
> > > Best Wishes,
> > > Peng Zheng
> > >
> > > __________________________________________________
> > > Do you Yahoo!?
> > > Yahoo! News - Today's headlines
> > > http://news.yahoo.com
> >
> > __________________________________________________
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > Get cool ringtones and name logos for your phone!
> > http://sg.mobile.yahoo.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Oct 07 2002 - 07:43:50 GMT-3