From: Michael Davis (miked@netrus.net)
Date: Fri Sep 13 2002 - 01:05:10 GMT-3
Thanks Albert,
Good link, but the configs as presented in that doc don't work with
12.1(5)T10 on 2600.
You'll see significant packet loss (to the point that the link-pair is
useless) unless you disable route-caching/cef on the virtual-template
interface. Also, OSPF favored a slower BRI link on a neighboring router over
a multilinked pair of T1s until I used 'ip unnumbered' to address the
virtual-template interface.
Then, of course was the parser issue that Harbir was experiencing. Probably
a bug, but I didn't have time to dig into it.
Fortunately though, I didn't seen any of the DDTSs listed in the caveats -
most MLPoFR related are for 12.1Y, 12.1YE, 12.2, & 12.2T rather than 12.1T.
I didn't play around with the interleaving and fragmentation parameters,
though. Performance seemed fine.
Mike #7303
----- Original Message -----
From: "Wolfkiel Albert L PHCA" <WolfkielAL@phdnswc.navy.mil>
To: "CCIE Group Study (E-mail)" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 10:41 PM
Subject: FW: PPP over frame
> In today's issue of: Cisco TAC Newsletter Vol.4, No.9:
>
> Tech Note:
> Designing and Deploying Multilink PPP over Frame Relay and ATM
>
>
http://www.cisco.com/warp/customer/788/voice-qos/designing-mlp-over-fr-atm.h
> tml
> (available to registered users)
>
>
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/788/voice-qos/designing-mlp-over-fr-atm.htm
> l
> (available to nonregistered users)
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael Davis [mailto:miked@netrus.net]
> Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 15:16
> To: CCIE Group Study (E-mail)
> Subject: Fw: PPP over frame
>
> For the group...
>
> Mike #7303
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Oct 07 2002 - 07:43:50 GMT-3