From: Martin Dean (nobody@studygroup.com)
Date: Fri Sep 13 2002 - 20:16:24 GMT-3
Chances are that R1 do not have "no sync" on it and the routes are not
'best' routes - indicated by a > in the bgp routing table.
If routes dont have a > they will not be advertised out.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Raj" <raj.bahad@totalise.co.uk>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Friday, September 13, 2002 11:38 PM
Subject: Redistributing BGP into IGP
> Hi Group,
>
> I'm confused over a new command i have come across for BGP. Picture this
if
> you will,
>
> R5------------------------R1----------------------R2
> (BGP) (BGP/ RIP) (RIP)
>
> Essentially, R1 is running BGP and RIP. R1 also has IBGP connections to
> other routers. RIP and BGP are mutually redistributed on R1.
>
> R2 learns about BGP routes which are only attached directly to R1
(Loopback
> 0, Serial 1), however, all the other BGP routes which R1 has learnt from
its
> iBGP peering are not present in R2's routing table.
>
> The only way I got this resolved was by typing in the command "bgp
> redistribute-internal" under R1's BGP process.
>
> I was under the impression that when redistributing BGP into any IGP, the
> "redistribute bgp x" was sufficient. But what the following link states is
> that if you wish to redistribute IBGP routes, the above mentioned command
> must also be used.
>
>
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios121/121cgcr/ip_r
> /iprprt2/1rdbgp.htm#xtocid17
>
> Can anyone shed some light on this it terms of the functionality of this
> command. Essentially, what I am trying to say is that prior to today, i
was
> under the impression that "redistribute bgp x" was the ONLY command needed
> ?!
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> Raj.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Oct 07 2002 - 07:43:51 GMT-3