From: Mingzhou Nie (mnie@yahoo.com)
Date: Thu Sep 19 2002 - 14:21:30 GMT-3
elping,
direct encap WILL NOT work on subinterfaces. This has been discussed
and tested relentlessly in the past.
Let me know your working config that direct works with subinterfaces.
I'm curious to know.
Ming
--- beda jain <bpjain@cisco.com> wrote:
>
> i try dlsw lile in p-2-mp sub interface in one site and other side
> mail
> interface.
>
> I did not work. do you have working config.
>
> Thanks,
> Beda
>
> At 10:48 PM 9/17/2002 -0400, elping wrote:
> >dlsw direct will work on subinterface if it is passthru
> >done it many times..
> >
> >Elping
> >CCIE
> >
> >Mingzhou Nie wrote:
> >
> > > beda,
> > >
> > > dlsw direct will not work on any type of subinterfaces but main
> > > interface. dlsw lite will work on subinterfaces as well as main
> > > interface. With p-to-p interface, no "frame map llc2 <dlci>" is
> needed.
> > >
> > > http://www.groupstudy.com/archives/ccielab/200204/threads.html
> > > search on "DSLW direct encap --Peer disconnected"
> > >
> > > Ming
> > >
> > > --- beda jain <bpjain@cisco.com> wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > does Dlsw lite work in frame-relay multipoint interface or not.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Beda
> > > >
> > > > At 10:17 AM 9/17/2002 -0700, Mingzhou Nie wrote:
> > > > >donny,
> > > > >
> > > > >this question has been asked several times in the past. I'm
> > > > resending
> > > > >my personal notes again.
> > > > >
> > > > >****
> > > > >- encapsulation: watch out direct encap and llc2(dlsw lite)
> encap.
> > > > both
> > > > >reference individual dlci, but the first one needs "pass-thru"
> > > > option
> > > > >at the end and map dlci to dlsw, vs. the latter one doesn't
> use
> > > > >"pass-thru" and map dlci to llc2. direct encap only works on
> main
> > > > >interface. and direct encap doesn't work with backup peer. you
> can
> > > > not
> > > > >configure ip address in "dlsw local-peer" statement.
> > > >
> >http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/cc/pd/ibsw/ibdlsw/tech/dls3_rg.htm
> > > >
> > >
>
>http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/cisintwk/idg4/nd2007.htm#xtocid31
> > > >
> >http://www.groupstudy.com/archives/ccielab/200201/msg00583.html
> > > >
> >http://www.groupstudy.com/archives/ccielab/200111/msg00784.html
> > > >
> >http://www.groupstudy.com/archives/ccielab/200201/msg00945.html
> > > > >
> > > > >****
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >--- Chris Hugo <chrishugo@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > > > > Remote Peer stays the same with both.Just the map
> statements will
> > > > > > differ
> > > > > > frame-relay map LLC2 is "DLSW Lite" --Which has local
> > > > acknowledgment
> > > > > > frame-relay map DLSW is Direct Encapsulation--Which does
> not have
> > > > > > local acknowledgment
> > > > > > I'm sure others will add to the post. But here is some
> before I
> > > > sleep
> > > > > > :)
> > > > > > chris hugo
> > > > > > Donny MATEO wrote: Hi Group,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I need help to clarify what is the difference between these
> two
> > > > > > configs for DLSW direct
> > > > > > encapsulation :
> > > > > >
> > > > > > dlsw remote-peer 0 frame-relay interface serial 0
> > > > > > int s0
> > > > > > frame-relay map llc2 131
> > > > > >
> > > > > > and
> > > > > >
> > > > > > dlsw remote-peer 0 frame-relay interface serial 0 131
> > > > > > int s0
> > > > > > frame-relay map dlsw 131
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Solie says to use the latter for a multipoint interface. I
> tried
> > > > the
> > > > > > latter, but the state seems to
> > > > > > stay at disconnect. If I add the statement frame-relay map
> llc2
> > > > 131,
> > > > > > then it would become connect.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Any clue ?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > tks.
> > > > > > Donny
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > This message is for information purposes only and its
> content
> > > > > > should not be construed as an offer, or solicitation of an
> offer,
> > > > > > to buy or sell any banking or financial instruments or
> services
> > > > > > and no representation or warranty is given in respect of
> its
> > > > > > accuracy, completeness or fairness. The material is subject
> > > > > > to change without notice. You should take your own
> independent
> > > > > > tax, legal and other professional advice in respect of the
> > > > content
> > > > > > of this message. This message may contain confidential or
> > > > > > legally privileged material and may not be copied,
> redistributed
> > > > > > or published (in whole or in part) without our prior
> written
> > > > consent.
> > > > > > This email may have been intercepted, partially destroyed,
> > > > > > arrive late, incomplete or contain viruses and no liability
> is
> > > > > > accepted by any member of the Credit Agricole Indosuez
> group
> > > > > > as a result. If you are not the intended recipient of this
> > > > message,
> > > > > > please immediately notify the sender and delete this
> message
> > > > > > from your computer.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > ---------------------------------
> > > > > > Do you Yahoo!?
> > > > > > Yahoo! News - Today's headlines
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >__________________________________________________
> > > > >Do you Yahoo!?
> > > > >Yahoo! News - Today's headlines
> > > > >http://news.yahoo.com
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > __________________________________________________
> > > Do you Yahoo!?
> > > Yahoo! News - Today's headlines
> > > http://news.yahoo.com
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Oct 07 2002 - 07:43:57 GMT-3