From: Nick Shah (nshah@connect.com.au)
Date: Sat Sep 21 2002 - 23:05:35 GMT-3
Assuming that R2, R1 & R8 are running IGP..
- Configure 1 session from R8 to R1 -- > advertise 150.x.x.x (use distribute
list to only advertise 150.x.x.x)
- Configure 1 x ebgp multihop session from R8 to R1 ---- > advertise
160.x,.x.x (use distribute list)
There is a table-map function, but I doubt it will help u otherwise (table
map is used to modify tag & metric while the route is put into the routing
table, from BGP table)
For the latter requirement you can try to use as prepend.
rgds
----- Original Message -----
From: kpalmer <kip.palmer@verizon.net>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Sunday, September 22, 2002 11:16 AM
Subject: BGP Attrib ?
> BGP Question:
>
> Can I have an AS receive a route from a EBGP neighbor and not install it
> in either
> IP or BGP tables, but still advertise it to an EBGP peer? The
> requirement is configure
> R8 so that R1 only sees 150.x.x.x. AND.... configure R8 so that the
> route 160.100.0.0
> appears to R2 as if it has passed through AS 1.
>
>
> as300 as400 as200
> r2---------r1---------r8 |r8 advertising routes 160. and 150.
>
>
>
> The later is a prepend thing, but also means that AS 400 has to
> receive and pass the route? ...without installing it?
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> Kip Palmer
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Oct 07 2002 - 07:43:59 GMT-3