CB WFQ

From: Adam Crisp (adam.crisp@totalise.co.uk)
Date: Mon Sep 23 2002 - 08:31:22 GMT-3

• Next message: Chuck Church: "RE: Is it possible to config bridge under sub-interface for2500"
• Previous message: Carlos G Mendioroz: "Re: Basic BGP decision process"
• Next in thread: Scott Morris: "RE: CB WFQ"
• Maybe reply: Scott Morris: "RE: CB WFQ"
• Maybe reply: stephen.paynter@bt.com: "RE: CB WFQ"
• Maybe reply: Carlos G Mendioroz: "Re: CB WFQ"
• Maybe reply: Scott Morris: "RE: CB WFQ"
• Maybe reply: elping: "Re: CB WFQ"
• Maybe reply: Scott Morris: "RE: CB WFQ"
• Maybe reply: elping: "Re: CB WFQ"
• Maybe reply: Scott Morris: "RE: CB WFQ"
• Maybe reply: elping: "Re: CB WFQ"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Hi,

If asked to divide up bandwidth EXACTLY, can I use CB-WFQ, with the
"bandwidth percent XX" command?

eg

class-map match-all my_class_queue_ip
  match access-group 25
!
policy-map my_policy
  class my_class_queue_ip
   bandwidth percent 50

OR does this call for Custom Queuing?

thanks in advance...

• Next message: Chuck Church: "RE: Is it possible to config bridge under sub-interface for2500"
• Previous message: Carlos G Mendioroz: "Re: Basic BGP decision process"
• Next in thread: Scott Morris: "RE: CB WFQ"
• Maybe reply: Scott Morris: "RE: CB WFQ"
• Maybe reply: stephen.paynter@bt.com: "RE: CB WFQ"
• Maybe reply: Carlos G Mendioroz: "Re: CB WFQ"
• Maybe reply: Scott Morris: "RE: CB WFQ"
• Maybe reply: elping: "Re: CB WFQ"
• Maybe reply: Scott Morris: "RE: CB WFQ"
• Maybe reply: elping: "Re: CB WFQ"
• Maybe reply: Scott Morris: "RE: CB WFQ"
• Maybe reply: elping: "Re: CB WFQ"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Oct 07 2002 - 07:44:00 GMT-3