RE: Soile's Skynet Lab

From: Larson, Chris (CLarson@usaid.gov)
Date: Tue Sep 24 2002 - 16:34:18 GMT-3


I have not done Solies yet, but I know you do have to make all the timers
match in OSPF for adjencies to form, however I do not think that simply
making timers match is a solution to differeing OSPF network types. Is that
correct??

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joe Martin [SMTP:jmartin@capitalpremium.net]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 2:41 PM
> To: Persio Pucci; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: RE: Soile's Skynet Lab
>
> Persio,
>
> Read the thread on OSPF Dead Interval.
>
> If you change only the hello timer all the other timers are automatically
> updated.
>
> Joe
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
> Persio Pucci
> Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 12:01 PM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Soile's Skynet Lab
>
>
> Folks,
>
> going through Soile's Skynet lab, I came upon one doubt: You are supposed
> to
> chenge the OSPF Hello timer to 60s on R3. Also, you are supposed to
> overcome
> the different network problem between R1, R2 and R3 without using "ip ospf
> network", and by this, you have to change also the timers. It's okay then
> that
> the three routers agree upon 60s hello timers.
>
> My question is: shoudn't the dead timers be changed as well? I am asking
> this
> because on the Skynet solution guide, there's no change on the dead timer
> for
> any router.
>
> Regards,
>
> Persio



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Oct 07 2002 - 07:44:02 GMT-3