RE: EIGRP adj wo/network stmt?

From: Scott Morris (swm@emanon.com)
Date: Sun Sep 29 2002 - 09:38:16 GMT-3

• Next message: Scott Morris: "RE: CB WFQ"
• Previous message: Svuillaume8@aol.com: "Re: redistribute ospf into rip"
• Maybe in reply to: Troy Rader: "EIGRP adj wo/network stmt?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Then you're still using a network statement, just on a different
interface (still the same one you're forming the adacency on). :)

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Chris Hugo
Sent: Sunday, September 29, 2002 2:02 AM
To: Troy Rader; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: EIGRP adj wo/network stmt?

Hi Troy,
Try a tunnel between the routers instead of the physical interface. hth,
chris hugo Troy Rader wrote:Is it possible to form an EIGRP adjacency
without using a network statement for the network on the link over which
I would want to form the adjacency?

Thanks.

---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
New DSL Internet Access from SBC & Yahoo!

• Next message: Scott Morris: "RE: CB WFQ"
• Previous message: Svuillaume8@aol.com: "Re: redistribute ospf into rip"
• Maybe in reply to: Troy Rader: "EIGRP adj wo/network stmt?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Oct 07 2002 - 07:44:07 GMT-3