From: Brian McGahan (brian@cyscoexpert.com)
Date: Mon Sep 30 2002 - 00:23:28 GMT-3
Donny,
I can't recommend a single solution to use. It always depends
on the requirements and restrictions they place on you. Just remember,
they're not going to ask you something that can't be done. Each and
every scenario can be accomplished based on the requirements and
restrictions.
This may seem like an obvious statement, however one of the
pitfalls that I see many of my students falling into is over-analyzing
the question presented. Take every question for its face value.
Period. If they say you can't do something, don't do it. You can bet
on it that if violate their conditions, you will not get the points,
regardless of whether your solution works or not.
I would recommend you explore all options possible that you can
think of. That way, you will have a wider variety of tools in your bag
to work with when you are faced with a specific problem. This exam is
used to test your problem solving skills. If you can think dynamically,
and adapt to a problem based on a certain set of requirements, you will
pass.
Summarization, tunneling, secondary addressing, policy routing,
default routing, static routing, default networks... these are all valid
solutions. It's up to you to determine where and when to apply them.
Does that answer your question?
HTH
Brian McGahan, CCIE #8593
Director of Design and Implementation
brian@cyscoexpert.com
CyscoExpert Corporation
Internetwork Consulting & Training
http://www.cyscoexpert.com
Voice: 847.674.3392
Fax: 847.674.2625
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf
Of
> Donny MATEO
> Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 9:27 PM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: RE: summary to null 0 allowed?
>
> Hi Brian,
>
> in that case what is the use of summarization in dynamic routing
protocol
> ? Are we suppose to create
> a tunnel/secondary address for every subnet which is not the same as
your
> classfull routing protocol
> ?
> Or having said it, they don't care as long as we get rid of the null0
> route using the following
>
> 1. No discard-route internal for OSPF internal route only
> 2. Use distribute-list for any other else
> Distribute-list 1 in Null0
> access1 permit any
>
> Or strictly no summarization unless told and deal with discontiguous
> subnets with the following
> 1. If you wanna take risk of creating another subnet and another
> interface, use tunnel.
> 2. Use secondary addressing
> 3. create a dummy routing process in case of OSPF
>
> Donny
>
>
>
> This message is for information purposes only and its content
> should not be construed as an offer, or solicitation of an offer,
> to buy or sell any banking or financial instruments or services
> and no representation or warranty is given in respect of its
> accuracy, completeness or fairness. The material is subject
> to change without notice. You should take your own independent
> tax, legal and other professional advice in respect of the content
> of this message. This message may contain confidential or
> legally privileged material and may not be copied, redistributed
> or published (in whole or in part) without our prior written consent.
> This email may have been intercepted, partially destroyed,
> arrive late, incomplete or contain viruses and no liability is
> accepted by any member of the Credit Agricole Indosuez group
> as a result. If you are not the intended recipient of this message,
> please immediately notify the sender and delete this message
> from your computer.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Oct 07 2002 - 07:44:07 GMT-3