From: folivore (folivore@hotmail.com)
Date: Mon Sep 30 2002 - 20:51:00 GMT-3
Actually I met this id problem before.
Confederation sure works, so does full mesh.
but changing area is useless.
OSPF route-id comes from the original router and remains unchanged in the
LSA propogation throughout the ospf AS,
I doubt there is a way to change it. maybe summarization on RR?
----- Original Message -----
From: "Paglia, John (USPC.PCT.Hopewell)" <JPaglia@NA2.US.ML.com>
To: "'Ayman Hamza'" <ayhamza@cisco.com>; <chenyan@deeptht.com.cn>
Cc: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 2:57 PM
Subject: RE: bgp syn problem
> http://www.groupstudy.com/archives/ccielab/200201/msg03096.html
>
> Have a look at this prior groupstudy mailer. I had the same issue, nad it
> summed up my problem to a 'T'. Hopefully it will help you out too...
>
> John
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Ayman Hamza [SMTP:ayhamza@cisco.com]
> > Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 2:44 PM
> > To: chenyan@deeptht.com.cn
> > Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > Subject: Re: bgp syn problem
> >
> > Check the NEXT HOP attribute address if it's reachable or not!
> >
> > Regards;
> > Ayman
> >
> > > From nobody@groupstudy.com Sun Sep 29 04:41:00 2002
> > > From: "chenyan" <chenyan@deeptht.com.cn>
> > > To: "ccielab" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> > > Subject: bgp syn problem
> > > Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2002 12:19:20 +0800
> > > MIME-Version: 1.0
> > > X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000
> > > X-OriginalArrivalTime: 24 Sep 2002 04:24:05.0125 (UTC)
> > > FILETIME=[37B43350:01C26382]
> > > X-ASK-Info: Whitelist match
> > > X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by
GroupStudy.com
> > > X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain
> > > Sender: nobody@groupstudy.com
> > > Reply-To: "chenyan" <chenyan@deeptht.com.cn>
> > >
> > > Hi,guys
> > >
> > > I use the IBGP over IGP with the syn enabled, and all the networks
> > advertised by IBGP are acknowlodegd by the IGP, and I can ping them by
> > IGP, but they are not available in the BGP Table. WHY?
> > >
> > > Thanks
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Oct 07 2002 - 07:44:08 GMT-3