From: Tom Young (gitsyoung@yahoo.co.jp)
Date: Mon Sep 30 2002 - 22:04:54 GMT-3
Hi, group:
A question for the secondary address. The example
below take a nat for 10.10.10.0/24 and make the rip for
the secondary address. In the reference book , it said use
the rip with secondary address for broadcast rip message
into network. But I don't know the reason, if I want to
communicate with 200.200.200.0/24, the nat is enough. And
the rip hasn't revelation with 10.10.10.0/24, so I think
the rip is meanless, isn't it ?
Thanks alot
hostname router_a
!
enable secret 5 $1$.s1R$iaEqZxLnYJo2QlZi8UNaO0
enable password guess
!
ip nat pool nat-example 200.200.200.1 200.200.200.1
prefix-length 24
ip nat inside source list 1 pool nat-example overload
!
interface Ethernet0/0
ip address 200.200.200.1 255.255.255.0 secondary
ip address 10.10.10.1 255.255.255.0
ip nat inside
!
interface Serial0/0
ip address 150.100.10.72 255.255.255.0
ip nat outside
encapsulation frame-relay
!
interface TokenRing0/0
no ip address
shutdown
ring-speed 16
!
interface FastEthernet1/0
no ip address
shutdown
!
router rip
network 200.200.200.0
network 150.100.0.0
!
ip classless
no logging buffered
access-list 1 permit 10.10.10.0 0.0.0.255
!
line con 0
exec-timeout 0 0
line aux 0
line vty 0 4
login
!
end
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Oct 07 2002 - 07:44:08 GMT-3