Re: nat problem

From: Erick B. (erickbe@yahoo.com)
Date: Mon Oct 07 2002 - 23:41:04 GMT-3

Next message: Tony Huang: "RE: 3rd time worst!"
Previous message: Paglia, John (USPC.PCT.Hopewell): "RE: FRTS"
Maybe in reply to: chenyan: "nat problem"
Next in thread: Desimone, Aurelio: "RE: nat problem"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Yes. This is a common configuration and there are
examples on cisco.com doing this.

Sample:

int e0
  description Department A
  ip nat inside
  ip address 10.2.1.1 255.255.255.0
int e1
  description Department B
  ip nat inside
  ip address 10.1.1.1 255.255.255.0
int s0
  description Internet
  ip nat outside

ip nat inside source list 101 interface s0 overload

access-list 101 permit ip 10.0.0.0 0.255.255.255 any

--- chenyan <chenyan@deeptht.com.cn> wrote:
> Hi,guys
>
> Is possible to have more than one "ip nat inside"
> and only one "ip nat outside" on one router?
>
> Thanks

Next message: Tony Huang: "RE: 3rd time worst!"
Previous message: Paglia, John (USPC.PCT.Hopewell): "RE: FRTS"
Maybe in reply to: chenyan: "nat problem"
Next in thread: Desimone, Aurelio: "RE: nat problem"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Nov 05 2002 - 08:35:41 GMT-3