From: ying c (bf5tgh1@yahoo.com)
Date: Wed Oct 09 2002 - 09:28:18 GMT-3
Todd,
Thanks for pointing out the release. I probably should
read the release notes, but can you tell us which kind
of spanning-tree problem you are referring to?
Chang
--- Todd.Reagan@nokia.com wrote:
> Check your software version on the 3550, the aging
> command is in the
> 3550 with 12.1(9)EA1c that I have.
>
> I also know IOS 12.1(11)EA1 is out for the 3550
> which fixes a big
> spanning-tree problem...
>
> Todd
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ext Peter Whittle
> [mailto:peter@whittle-systems.demon.co.uk]
> Sent: 08 October, 2002 15:09
> To: CCIELab Studygroup
> Subject: CAT 3550 port security aging??
>
>
> One of the popular commercial lab scenarios has a
> section on CAT3550.
>
> It requires you to implement port-security tied to a
> particular NIC
> card.
>
> No problem
>
> "int fa0/1
> switchport port-security
> switchport port-security mac-address
> 0002.abcd.ef10
> "
>
> I hear you say.
>
> However, it goes on to require you to allow a new
> NIC to connect after
> xxx if it has not heard from the original NIC. ie to
> age out the port-
> security mac address.
>
> The solution suggests that there is a 'switchport
> port-security aging
> time xxxx' command. However, on the 3550 that I
> tried it on there is no
> such command!
>
> Nor is it documented on the March 2002 CD under the
> CAT3550.
>
> There is such an option for a CAT2924XL with recent
> firmware.
>
> Any Ideas?
>
> Thanks
>
> Peter
>
> --
> Peter Whittle
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Nov 05 2002 - 08:35:43 GMT-3