From: Larson, Chris (CLarson@usaid.gov)
Date: Wed Oct 16 2002 - 14:59:47 GMT-3
Actually, I was doing border peers. R8 border is R7 and R1 border is R5. R5
and R7 are peers. This all works great until I try to go from token to ether
on seperate routers. Peers connect. I can even see the circuit come up (sh
dlsw circuit).
To make it simpler, I have even removed all the SR\TLB statements and have
done away with the broder capabilities. Still no worky. 
What I get now is the host shows up in the Nethood but you can't access the
share. Windows complains about net busy. Yet when I move back to doing it on
the same router, or different routers using same media everything is great.
New configs, still not working correctly.
R1
!
dlsw local-peer peer-id 150.50.1.1
dlsw remote-peer 0 tcp 150.50.8.8
dlsw bridge-group 1
!
interface Ethernet0
 ip address 150.50.10.1 255.255.255.0
 no ip directed-broadcast
 bridge-group 1
!
interface Ethernet1
 description Connected to port E0 on R2 IP 150.50.17.2/24
 ip address 150.50.12.1 255.255.255.0
 no ip directed-broadcast
 bridge-group 1
R8
source-bridge ring-group 200
dlsw local-peer peer-id 150.50.8.8
dlsw remote-peer 0 tcp 150.50.1.1
!
!
interface Loopback0
 ip address 150.50.8.8 255.255.255.0
!
!
interface TokenRing0
 description Ring 2
 ip address 150.50.88.8 255.255.255.0
 ring-speed 16
 source-bridge 100 1 200
 source-bridge spanning
> -----Original Message-----
> From:	McClure, Allen [SMTP:Allen.McClure@Tricon-Yum.Com]
> Sent:	Wednesday, October 16, 2002 1:18 PM
> To:	ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject:	RE: DLSW problem
> 
> Try it without the group statements on your peers and see what happens.
> You shouldn't need them for this requirement.
> 
> Allen McClure
> MCSE, CCNP, CCDP
> YUM! Brands, Inc.
> Sr. Network Analyst
> NEW E-Mail - mailto:allen.mcclure@yum.com
> 972-338-7494
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Larson, Chris [mailto:CLarson@usaid.gov] 
> Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2002 11:04 AM
> To: 'ccielab@groupstudy.com'
> Subject: DLSW problem
> 
> 
> I am running netbui only on my 2 workstations. They have ethernet and
> token cards.
> 
> I can get TR to TR dlsw connectivity and see all shares in nethood. I
> can get Ether to Ether dlsw connectivity and see all shares in nethood.
> I can get Ether to TR in the same router using SR\TLB and DLSW and see
> all shares in nethood.
> 
> 
> 
> I cannot get ether to tokenring on seperate routers to work. I can debug
> and see that the remote sends NETBIOS_NAME_RECOGNIZED in a response to
> the NETBIOS_NAME_QUEURY. It appears as if a circuit is established but
> the Windows comes up with an error about the net ebing busy.
> 
> Below is the debug output from R1 as well as the pertinent config.
> Notice R8 is doing both SR\TLB for the local ether to tr as well as
> DLSW+ for the remote ethernet on R1.
> 
> R1 config:
> 
> dlsw local-peer peer-id 150.50.1.1 group 5 promiscuous
> dlsw remote-peer 0 tcp 150.50.5.5
> dlsw bridge-group 1
> !
> 
> interface Ethernet0
>  ip address 150.50.10.1 255.255.255.0
>  no ip directed-broadcast
>  bridge-group 1
> !
> !
> !
> bridge 1 protocol ieee
> !
> 
> R8 config:
> 
> hostname R8
> !
> logging rate-limit console 10 except errors
> !
> ip subnet-zero
> no ip finger
> no ip domain-lookup
> !
> cns event-service server
> !
> !
> !
> source-bridge ring-group 100
> source-bridge transparent 100 1 1 1
> dlsw local-peer peer-id 150.50.8.8 group 7 promiscuous
> dlsw remote-peer 0 tcp 150.50.7.7
> dlsw bridge-group 1
> !
> !
> interface Loopback0
>  ip address 150.50.8.8 255.255.255.0
> !
> interface Ethernet0
>  description Backbone #2
>  ip address 150.50.80.8 255.255.255.0
>  no keepalive
>  bridge-group 1
> !
> interface TokenRing0
>  description Ring 2
>  ip address 150.50.88.8 255.255.255.0
>  ring-speed 16
>  source-bridge 200 1 100
>  source-bridge spanning
> !
> !
> bridge 1 protocol ieee
> bridge 1 bitswap-layer3-addresses
> 
> 
> Here is the debug on R1.  Peers can ping each other just fine.
> 
> 
> R1 debug:
> 1d22h: DLSw: Recv border to member packet from peer 150.50.5.5(2065)
> 1d22h: %DLSWC-3-RECVSSP: SSP OP = 18( NBNQ ) -explorer from peer
> 150.50.8.8(2065)
> 1d22h:  DISP Sent : CLSI Msg : UDATA_STN.Req   dlen: 90 
> 1d22h:  DLSW Received-ctlQ : CLSI Msg : UDATA_STN.Ind   dlen: 79 
> 1d22h: CSM: Received CLSI Msg : UDATA_STN.Ind   dlen: 79 from DLSw Port0
> 1d22h: CSM:   smac 000a.4fee.dfb6, dmac 0000.f6e6.4468, ssap F0, dsap F0
> 1d22h: CSM: Received frame type NETBIOS NAME_RECOGNIZED from
> 000a.4fee.dfb6, DL0
> 1d22h: DLSw: passive open 150.50.8.8(11030) -> 2065
> 1d22h: DLSw: START-TPFSM (peer 150.50.8.8(2065)): event:TCP-RD PIPE
> OPENED state:DISCONN
> 1d22h: DLSw: dtp_action_c() opening write pipe for peer 150.50.8.8(2065)
> 1d22h: DLSw: END-TPFSM (peer 150.50.8.8(2065)): state:DISCONN->WWR_RDOP
> 
> 1d22h: DLSw: Async Open Callback 150.50.8.8(2065) -> 11018
> 1d22h: DLSw: START-TPFSM (peer 150.50.8.8(2065)): event:TCP-WR PIPE
> OPENED state:WWR_RDOP
> 1d22h: DLSw: dtp_action_i() write pipe opened for peer 150.50.8.8(2065)
> 1d22h: DLSw: CapExId Msg sent to peer 150.50.8.8(2065)
> 1d22h: DLSw: END-TPFSM (peer 150.50.8.8(2065)): state:WWR_RDOP->WAIT_CAP
> 
> 1d22h: DLSw: START-TPFSM (peer 150.50.8.8(2065)): event:SSP-CAP MSG RCVD
> state:WAIT_CAP
> 1d22h: DLSw: dtp_action_j() cap msg rcvd from peer 150.50.8.8(2065)
> 1d22h: DLSw: Recv CapExId Msg from peer 150.50.8.8(2065)
> 1d22h: DLSw: received fhpr capex from peer 150.50.8.8(2065): support:
> false,
> fst-prio: false
> 1d22h: DLSw: Pos CapExResp sent to peer 150.50.8.8(2065)
> 1d22h: DLSw: END-TPFSM (peer 150.50.8.8(2065)): state:WAIT_CAP->WAIT_CAP
> 
> 1d22h: DLSw: START-TPFSM (peer 150.50.8.8(2065)): event:SSP-CAP MSG RCVD
> state:WAIT_CAP
> 1d22h: DLSw: dtp_action_j() cap msg rcvd from peer 150.50.8.8(2065)
> 1d22h: DLSw: Recv CapExPosRsp Msg from peer 150.50.8.8(2065)
> 1d22h: DLSw: END-TPFSM (peer 150.50.8.8(2065)): state:WAIT_CAP->WAIT_CAP
> 
> 1d22h: DLSw: Processing delayed event:SSP-CAP EXCHANGED - prev
> state:WAIT_CAP
> 1d22h: DLSw: START-TPFSM (peer 150.50.8.8(2065)): event:SSP-CAP
> EXCHANGED state:WAIT_CAP
> 1d22h: DLSw: dtp_action_k() cap xchged for peer 150.50.8.8(2065)
> 1d22h: DLSw: END-TPFSM (peer 150.50.8.8(2065)): state:WAIT_CAP->PCONN_WT
> 
> 1d22h: DLSw: dlsw_tcpd_fini() for peer 150.50.8.8(2065)
> 1d22h: DLSw: dlsw_tcpd_fini() closing write pipe for peer 150.50.8.8
> 1d22h: DLSw: START-TPFSM (peer 150.50.8.8(2065)): event:TCP-CLOSE WR
> PIPE state:PCONN_WT
> 1d22h: DLSw: dtp_action_l() close write pipe for peer 150.50.8.8(2065)
> 1d22h: DLSw: closing write pipe tcp connection for peer 150.50.8.8(2065)
> 1d22h: DLSw: END-TPFSM (peer 150.50.8.8(2065)): state:PCONN_WT->PCONN_WT
> 
> 1d22h: DLSw: Processing delayed event:TCP-PEER CONNECTED - prev
> state:PCONN_WT
> 1d22h: DLSw: START-TPFSM (peer 150.50.8.8(2065)): event:TCP-PEER
> CONNECTED state:PCONN_WT
> 1d22h: DLSw: dtp_action_m() peer connected for peer 150.50.8.8(2065)
> 1d22h: DLSw: END-TPFSM (peer 150.50.8.8(2065)): state:PCONN_WT->CONNECT
> 
> 1d22h: %DLSWC-3-RECVSSP: SSP OP = 3( CUR  )  from peer 150.50.8.8(2065)
> 1d22h: DLSw: START-TPFSM (peer 150.50.8.8(2065)): event:CORE-ADD CIRCUIT
> state:CONNECT
> 1d22h: DLSw: dtp_action_u(), peer add circuit for peer 150.50.8.8(2065)
> 1d22h: DLSw: END-TPFSM (peer 150.50.8.8(2065)): state:CONNECT->CONNECT
> 
> 1d22h: DLSw: START-FSM (1593835539): event:WAN-CUR state:DISCONNECTED
> 1d22h: DLSw: core: dlsw_action_c()
> 1d22h:  DISP Sent : CLSI Msg : REQ_OPNSTN.Req   dlen: 114 
> 1d22h: DLSw: END-FSM (1593835539): state:DISCONNECTED->REMOTE_RESOLVE
> 
> 1d22h:  DLSW Received-ctlQ : CLSI Msg : REQ_OPNSTN.Cfm CLS_OK dlen: 114 
> 1d22h: DLSw: START-FSM (1593835539): event:DLC-ReqOpnStn.Cnf
> state:REMOTE_RESOLVE
> 1d22h: DLSw: core: dlsw_action_d()
> 1d22h: CORE: Setting lf : bits 8 : size 1500
> 1d22h: DLSw: 1593835539 sent RWO
> 1d22h: DLSw: 1593835539 sent FCI 80 on  ICR   - s:0 so:0 r:20 ro:1
> 1d22h: %DLSWC-3-SENDSSP: SSP OP = 4( ICR  )  to peer 150.50.8.8(2065)
> success
> 1d22h: DLSw: END-FSM (1593835539): state:REMOTE_RESOLVE->CKT_PENDING
> 
> 1d22h: %DLSWC-3-RECVSSP: SSP OP = 5( ACK  )  from peer 150.50.8.8(2065)
> 1d22h: DLSw: 1593835539 recv FCI 0 - s:0 so:0 r:20 ro:1
> 1d22h: DLSw: 1593835539 recv RWO
> 1d22h: DLSw: START-FSM (1593835539): event:WAN-ACK state:CKT_PENDING
> 1d22h: DLSw: core: dlsw_action_x()
> 1d22h: DLSw: END-FSM (1593835539): state:CKT_PENDING->CKT_ESTABLISHED
> 
> 1d22h: %DLSWC-3-RECVSSP: SSP OP = 8( CONQ )  from peer 150.50.8.8(2065)
> 1d22h: DLSw: 1593835539 recv FCA on  CONQ  - s:20 so:1 r:20 ro:0
> 1d22h: DLSw: START-FSM (1593835539): event:WAN-CONQ
> state:CKT_ESTABLISHED
> 1d22h: DLSw: core: dlsw_action_i()
> 1d22h:  DISP Sent : CLSI Msg : CONNECT.Req   dlen: 16 
> 1d22h: DLSw: END-FSM (1593835539):
> state:CKT_ESTABLISHED->CONTACT_PENDING
> 
> 1d22h:  DLSW Received-ctlQ : CLSI Msg : CONNECT.Cfm CLS_OK dlen: 28 
> 1d22h: DLSw: START-FSM (1593835539): event:DLC-Connect.Cnf
> state:CONTACT_PENDING
> 1d22h: DLSw: core: dlsw_action_j()
> 1d22h: DLSw: 1593835539 sent FCA on  CONR 
> 1d22h: %DLSWC-3-SENDSSP: SSP OP = 9( CONR )  to peer 150.50.8.8(2065)
> success
> 1d22h:  DISP Sent : CLSI Msg : FLOW.Req   dlen: 0 
> 1d22h: DLSw: END-FSM (1593835539): state:CONTACT_PENDING->CONNECTED
> 
> 1d22h: %DLSWC-3-RECVSSP: SSP OP = 10( INFO )  from peer 150.50.8.8(2065)
> 1d22h: DLSw: 1593835539 decr r - s:20 so:0 r:19 ro:0
> 1d22h: DLSw: START-FSM (1593835539): event:WAN-INFO state:CONNECTED
> 1d22h: DLSw: core: dlsw_action_m()
> 1d22h:  DISP Sent : CLSI Msg : DATA.Req   dlen: 34 
> 1d22h: DLSw: END-FSM (1593835539): state:CONNECTED->CONNECTED
> 
> 1d22h: DLSw: START-TPFSM (peer 150.50.5.5(2065)): event:DLX-KEEPALIVE
> REQ state:CONNECT
> 1d22h: DLSw: dtp_action_q() keepalive request from peer 150.50.5.5(2065)
> 1d22h: DLSw: Keepalive Response sent to peer 150.50.5.5(2065))
> 1d22h: DLSw: END-TPFSM (peer 150.50.5.5(2065)): state:CONNECT->CONNECT
> 
> 1d22h: %DLSWC-3-RECVSSP: SSP OP = 14( HLTQ )  from peer 150.50.8.8(2065)
> 1d22h: DLSw: START-FSM (1593835539): event:WAN-HLTQ state:CONNECTED
> 1d22h: DLSw: core: dlsw_action_o()
> 1d22h:  DISP Sent : CLSI Msg : DISCONNECT.Req   dlen: 4 
> 1d22h: DLSw: END-FSM (1593835539): state:CONNECTED->HALT_PENDING
> 
> 1d22h:  DLSW Received-ctlQ : CLSI Msg : DISCONNECT.Cfm CLS_OK dlen: 8 
> 1d22h: DLSw: START-FSM (1593835539): event:DLC-Disc.Cnf
> state:HALT_PENDING
> 1d22h: DLSw: core: dlsw_action_p()
> 1d22h: %DLSWC-3-SENDSSP: SSP OP = 15( HLTR )  to peer 150.50.8.8(2065)
> success
> 1d22h:  DISP Sent : CLSI Msg : CLOSE_STN.Req   dlen: 4 
> 1d22h: DLSw: END-FSM (1593835539): state:HALT_PENDING->CLOSE_PEND
> 
> 1d22h:  DLSW Received-ctlQ : CLSI Msg : CLOSE_STN.Cfm CLS_OK dlen: 8 
> 1d22h: DLSw: START-FSM (1593835539): event:DLC-CloseStn.Cnf
> state:CLOSE_PEND
> 1d22h: DLSw: core: dlsw_action_y()
> 1d22h: DLSw: 1593835539 to dead queue
> 1d22h: DLSw: START-TPFSM (peer 150.50.8.8(2065)): event:CORE-DELETE
> CIRCUIT state:CONNECT
> 1d22h: DLSw: dtp_action_v(), peer delete circuit for peer
> 150.50.8.8(2065)
> 1d22h: DLSw: END-TPFSM (peer 150.50.8.8(2065)): state:CONNECT->CONNECT
> 
> 1d22h: DLSw: END-FSM (1593835539): state:CLOSE_PEND->DISCONNECTED
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Christopher Larson - CNE, MCP+I, CCNP + Security
> Open Systems Sciences Corp.
> USAID Information Resources Management (contractor) 
> 202 712 4559
> clarson@usaid.gov
> 
> 
> This communication is confidential and may be legally privileged.  If you
> are not the intended recipient, (i) please do not read or disclose to
> others, (ii) please notify the sender by reply mail, and (iii) please
> delete this communication from your system.  Failure to follow this
> process may be unlawful.  Thank you for your cooperation.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Nov 05 2002 - 08:35:48 GMT-3