From: Angelo De Guzman (ghie_pogi@yahoo.com)
Date: Thu Oct 24 2002 - 04:15:26 GMT-3
Hi,
If R2 and R3 are not directly connected via
ethernet.
How can split-horizon be an issue? Of course you will
have a different ethernet network on R2 and R3.
Ciao,
Angelo
--- aansar@sscomp.com.sg wrote:
> here R2 and R3 also connected , so you dont have
> spilt horizon problem
> consider if R2 and R3 is not connected , then spilt
> horizon comes in to
> picture then u have to disable spilt horizon in the
> hub multi point
> interface
>
>
>
>
>
> Angelo De Guzman <ghie_pogi@yahoo.com>
> Sent by: nobody@groupstudy.com
> 10/24/2002 02:18 PM
> Please respond to Angelo De Guzman
>
>
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> cc:
> Subject: ip split-horizon eigrp
>
>
> Hi,
> R2 -|
> / |
> R1 |172.168.38.0/24
> \ |
> R3 -|
>
> R1 subinter is point-to-multi
> R2 is physical
> R3 is physical
>
> I'm running EIGRP.
>
> Do I need to enable?
>
> ip split-horizon eigrp 10 on the spokes
>
> My objective is to see the ethernet network on R1
> via R2 and R3.
>
> Actually when I use no or with ip split-horizon
> eigrp
> 10 on the spokes. I see on R1 network 172.168.38.0
> reachable via R2 and R3. So what is correct?
>
> Thanks,
> Angelo
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Y! Web Hosting - Let the expert host your web site
> http://webhosting.yahoo.com/
>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Nov 05 2002 - 08:35:55 GMT-3