From: Tan huynh Ngoc (ngoctansq@yahoo.com)
Date: Sat Nov 16 2002 - 10:46:28 GMT-3
> Hi all !
> I don't know if this was asked but i ask anyway . It
> is about TCP header compression when using
> conjuction
> with Back-to-Back frame-relay . In the IP-expert
> book
> , Lab 303 . When i used TCP header compression
> passive
> mode between two Router running back-to-back
> frame-relay , i noticed this : If two are both DTE ,
> the telnet session will work fine , but if one is
> DCE
> and the other is DTE , then i use TCP header
> compression on the DTE (DCE still worked fine)
> interface , the telnet session is looked like this :
>
> Trying to open 192.168.1.0.....Open (the terminal
> went
> blank)
>
>
> And I can't enter any command . I tested it for 2
> times , and the results are the same . Does anybody
> have any clue ?
> The 2 router running btb frame-relay had the same
> DLCI
> number , one act as the frame-relay switch . Both
> were
> configured with ip and connection worked properly
> .I
> can ping every where - also packet debuging show
> that
> it worked as fine as the requirement , and about
> this
> telnet stuff , it wasn't officially in the Lab ( but
> i
> guess it 's a trap ?)
>
> Thanks in advance !
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Dec 03 2002 - 07:23:02 GMT-3