From: amilabs (amilabs@optonline.net)
Date: Tue Dec 10 2002 - 14:14:48 GMT-3
You may not need the switch at all. I recall that there were 8 port switch
modules for the 2600 that came out last year...
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
Chuck Church
Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2002 11:39 AM
To: tsiartas@ameritech.net; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: pix puzzle to failover Wlan to VPN tunnel
T,
I don't think you could use PIX. You're going to need to run a routing
protocol, so you know when the wireless is down, use the VPN (floating
static). A 2610 with a trunk-able switch should do the job. If a 17xx can
trunk, even cheaper.
Chuck Church
CCIE #8776, MCNE, MCSE
----- Original Message -----
From: <tsiartas@ameritech.net>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2002 10:34 AM
Subject: pix puzzle to failover Wlan to VPN tunnel
> This is a small but maybe common scenario pls respond if you have time
>
> I have a small network of 3 sites connected with a wireless Ethernet
> bridge
> I would like to have a backup vpn connection to the sites through the
> internet (dsl connection)
> I was thinking of using a 3 interface router at each site.
> one interface for client pcs
> second for wireless lan connection
> and third for the internet connection/vpn tunnel
>
> would that be the min hardware requirements?
> Can we do the above with a pix and avoid the router?
>
> Thanks
> t
> .
.
.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Jan 17 2003 - 17:21:42 GMT-3