From: Bob Sinclair (bsin@cox.net)
Date: Tue Dec 17 2002 - 16:59:18 GMT-3
Slattery (CCIE #1026) and Burton (CCIE #1119) use the following metric
routinely in their book, 'Advanced IP Routing in Cisco Networks'. It
results in the redistributed routes looking like they are locally on an
Ethernet:
10000 100 255 1 1500
You would probably be safe following their lead. But, as a veteran of four
lab attempts, I suggest that if you have any doubt, go ahead and ask the
proctor.
-Bob Sinclair
CCIE #10427
----- Original Message -----
From: "Joe Chang" <changjoe@earthlink.net>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 1:18 PM
Subject: Re: How to decide the metric value?Is that very important?
> > Now, in real networks rather than the lab, the hierarchy is often
> > more important than the metric.
>
> On the lab test, when I redistribute something into EIGRP I've always
frozen
> up wondering if the grader will slam me if I don't set the bandwidth,
delay,
> etc. correctly. I start adding up the maximum delay, then just give up and
> eyeball it. What's your approach? Anyone know if this is an issue to Cisco
?
> .
.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Jan 17 2003 - 17:21:47 GMT-3